search
HomeWeb Front-endJS TutorialAnalysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery_jquery

DOM tree

First, it is helpful to visualize the DOM tree of an HMTL document. A simple HTML page looks like this:
Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery_jquery
Event bubbling (also known as event propagation)
When we click a link, it triggers the click event of the link element, which triggers the execution of any function we have bound to the click event of that element.
Copy code The code is as follows:

$('a').bind('click' ,function(){alert('that tickles!')})

So a click operation will trigger the execution of the alert function.
Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery_jquery
The click event will then propagate towards the root of the tree, broadcasting to the parent element, and then to each ancestor element. As long as the click event on one of its descendant elements is triggered, the event will be passed to it.
Analysis of the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate() in jQuery_jquery
In the context of manipulating the DOM, document is the root node.
Now we can more easily explain the differences between .bind(), .live() and .delegate().
.bind()
Copy code The code is as follows:
$('a').bind ('click',function(){alert('That tickles!');})

This is the simplest binding method. JQuery scans the document to find all $('a') elements and binds the alert function to the click event of each element.
.live()
Copy code The code is as follows:
$('a').live ('click',function(){alert('That tickles!')})

JQuery binds the alert function to the $(document) element and uses 'click' and 'a' as parameters . Whenever an event bubbles up to the document node, it checks whether the event is a click event and whether the target element of the event matches the 'a' CSS selector. If so, it executes the function.
The live method can also be bound to a specific element (or "context") instead of the document, like this:
Copy code The code is as follows:
$('a',$('#container')[0]).live('click',function(){alert('That tickles!')} )

.delegate()
Copy code The code is as follows:
$('# container').delegate('a','click',function(){alert('That tickles!')})


JQuery scans the document to find $('#container'), and Bind the alert function to $('#container') using the click event and the 'a' CSS selector as parameters. Any time an event bubbles up to $('#container'), it checks to see if the event is a click event and if the target element of the event matches the CSS selector. If the results of both checks are true, it executes the function.
It can be noted that this process is similar to .live(), but it binds the handler to a specific element rather than the document. Savvy JS'ers might conclude that $('a').live() == $(document).delegate('a') , right? Well, no, not quite .
Why .delegate() is better than .live()
For several reasons, people usually prefer to use jQuery’s delegate method instead of the live method. Consider the following example:
Copy code The code is as follows:
$('a').live(' click', function() { blah() });

or
$(document).delegate('a', 'click', function() { blah() });
The latter is actually faster than the former, because the former has to scan the entire The document finds all $('a') elements and saves them as jQuery objects. Although the live function only needs to pass 'a' as a string parameter for later judgment, the $() function does not "know" that the linked method will be .live().

On the other hand, the delegate method only needs to find and store the $(document) element.
One way to seek to get around this problem is to call the live bound outside $(document).ready() so that it executes immediately. In this way, it runs before the DOM is populated, so no elements are found or jQuery objects are created.
Flexibility and chain capabilities
The live function is also quite confusing. Think about it, it's linked to the set of $('a') objects, but it actually works on the $(document) object. For this reason, it can try to chain methods onto itself in a scary way. In fact, what I'm saying is that the live method makes more sense as a global jQuery method in the form of $.live('a',...).
Only supports CSS selectors
Finally, the live method has a very big disadvantage, that is, it can only operate on direct CSS selectors, which makes it very inflexible.
To learn more about the shortcomings of CSS selectors, please refer to the article Exploring jQuery .live() and .die().
Update: Thanks to pedalpete on Hacker News and Ellsass in the comments below for reminding me to include this next section.
Why choose .live() or .delegate() instead of .bind()
After all, bind seems to be more clear and direct, doesn’t it? Well, there are two reasons why we prefer to choose delegate or live instead of bind:
1. To attach handlers to DOM elements that may not yet exist in the DOM. Because bind directly binds handlers to individual elements, it cannot bind handlers to elements that do not yet exist on the page.
2. If you run $('a').bind(…) and then new links are added to the page via AJAX, your bind handler will be invalid for these newly added links. Live and delegate, on the other hand, are bound to another ancestor node, so they are valid for any element that currently or will exist within that ancestor element.
3. Or to attach a handler to a single element or a small group of elements, listen to events on descendant elements instead of looping through and attaching the same function to 100 elements in the DOM one by one. There are performance benefits to attaching handlers to one (or a small set of) ancestor elements rather than directly attaching handlers to all elements in the page.
Stop spreading
The last reminder I want to make has to do with event propagation. Normally, we can terminate the execution of the handler function by using an event method like this:
Copy code The code is as follows:

$('a').bind('click',function(e){
e.preventDefault()
e.stopPropagation()}
)

However, when we use the live or delegate method, the handler function is not actually running. The function needs to wait until the event bubbles to the element that the handler is actually bound to. By this point, our other handler functions from .bind() have already run.
Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
The Relationship Between JavaScript, C  , and BrowsersThe Relationship Between JavaScript, C , and BrowsersMay 01, 2025 am 12:06 AM

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js Streams with TypeScriptNode.js Streams with TypeScriptApr 30, 2025 am 08:22 AM

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

Python vs. JavaScript: Performance and Efficiency ConsiderationsPython vs. JavaScript: Performance and Efficiency ConsiderationsApr 30, 2025 am 12:08 AM

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.

The Origins of JavaScript: Exploring Its Implementation LanguageThe Origins of JavaScript: Exploring Its Implementation LanguageApr 29, 2025 am 12:51 AM

JavaScript originated in 1995 and was created by Brandon Ike, and realized the language into C. 1.C language provides high performance and system-level programming capabilities for JavaScript. 2. JavaScript's memory management and performance optimization rely on C language. 3. The cross-platform feature of C language helps JavaScript run efficiently on different operating systems.

Behind the Scenes: What Language Powers JavaScript?Behind the Scenes: What Language Powers JavaScript?Apr 28, 2025 am 12:01 AM

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The Future of Python and JavaScript: Trends and PredictionsThe Future of Python and JavaScript: Trends and PredictionsApr 27, 2025 am 12:21 AM

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.

Python vs. JavaScript: Development Environments and ToolsPython vs. JavaScript: Development Environments and ToolsApr 26, 2025 am 12:09 AM

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

Is JavaScript Written in C? Examining the EvidenceIs JavaScript Written in C? Examining the EvidenceApr 25, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Yes, the engine core of JavaScript is written in C. 1) The C language provides efficient performance and underlying control, which is suitable for the development of JavaScript engine. 2) Taking the V8 engine as an example, its core is written in C, combining the efficiency and object-oriented characteristics of C. 3) The working principle of the JavaScript engine includes parsing, compiling and execution, and the C language plays a key role in these processes.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux latest version

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment