I saw an interview question a few days ago, and the question was like this:
Could you please tell me your understanding of apply, call, and bind in JavaScript?
First of all, apply and call are clichés, but as for bind, I was stunned for a moment, because this word is a frequently used method in jquery, which is used to bind events to DOM elements.
In order to understand this strange yet familiar bind, I googled and found that this method is natively implemented in JavaScript version 1.8.5. Currently, IE9, ff4, and chrome7 support this method, but opera and safari do not support it (explanation on MDN).
The function of bind is similar to that of apply and call, both of which change the execution context of the function, which is the point of the this keyword during runtime. But the usage is slightly different. A function can be executed later after being bound.
An example is as follows:
var person = {
name: 'Andrew',
job: 'web front end developer',
gender: 'male',
sayHello: function() {
return 'Hi, I am ' this.name ', a ' this.job;
}
}
console.log(person.sayHello()); // Hi, I am Andrew, a web front end developer
var anotherGuySayHello = person .sayHello.bind({
name:'Alex',
job: 'back end C# developer'
});
console.log(anotherGuySayHello()); // Hi, I am Alex, a back end C# developer
Another example with parameters:
function add(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
return arg1 ' ' arg2 ' ' arg3 ' ' arg4;
}
var addMore = add. bind({}, 'a', 'b');
console.log(addMore('c', 'd')); // a b c d
If your browser This method is not supported for the time being, but you think it is cool and want to use it. MDN also provides a reference implementation. This implementation is very interesting. The code is as follows:
if(!Function.prototype.bind) {
Function.prototype.bind = function(oThis) {
if( typeof this !== 'function') {
throw new TypeError('Function.prototype.bind - what is trying to be bound is not callable');
}
var fSlice = Array.prototype. slice,
aArgs = fSlice.call(arguments, 1),
fToBind = this,
fNOP = function() {},
fBound = function() {
return fToBind.apply (this instanceof fNOP ? this : oThis || window, aArgs.concat(fSlice.call(arguments)));
};
fNOP.prototype = this.prototype;
fBound.prototype = new fNOP ();
return fBound;
};
}
The last few lines of code are through the prototype chain, where fBound is a subclass that calls the bind function. Why is this so? For implementation, you can carefully look at the part fBound = function(){ return ... }, where this is determined at runtime. The main consideration here is if you use new to call the function (constructor method).
The following example can illustrate this point well. For the convenience of explanation, this example comes directly from MDN:
function Point(x,y) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
Point.prototype .toString = function() {
return this.x ',' this.y;
};
var p = new Point(1, 2);
p.toString(); / / 1,2
var emptyObj = {};
var YAxisPoint = Point.bind(emptyObj, 0);
var axisPoint = new YAxisPoint(5);
axisPoint.toString(); / / 0, 5
axisPoint instanceof Point; // true
axisPoint instanceof YAxisPoint; // true
The article link is given at the end for your further understanding
MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function/bind

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor
