The IndieWeb is gaining traction, even holding a conference! The New Yorker recently highlighted its relevance, framing the current social media crisis around a central question: server ownership. The article points out that most online activity occurs on servers controlled by a few massive corporations. These companies, not charging users directly, must recoup costs through other means, essentially extracting value from user data.
The IndieWeb's core principle is self-hosting: complete control over your website, unlike platforms where you're reliant on third-party services. This doesn't preclude using those services; instead, it advocates for syndication – using your own site as the primary source and then distributing content elsewhere.
Instead of tweeting, write a blog post and automatically share it on Twitter. Instead of using Medium, publish on your own blog and then syndicate to Medium. This approach leverages the benefits of these platforms without surrendering control.
Personally, self-hosting has been incredibly beneficial. Khoi Vinh eloquently describes its impact as an "amplifier," boosting his career visibility in ways that wouldn't have been possible otherwise.
While I self-host, I haven't fully embraced syndication, choosing not to cross-post to other platforms. While this might limit reach, given recent platform changes (like Hacker Noon, freeCodeCamp, and Signal vs. Nose), I'm hesitant to invest heavily in syndication strategies. The IndieWeb approach emphasizes syndication as re-posting, not as the primary location for original content, which is a crucial distinction.
My concern with syndication is potential SEO issues: would external SEO overshadow my own site's ranking? Relying on rel="canonical"
tags, which aren't universally supported (Medium, for example, requires import tools), is problematic. This explains the frequent "originally published on..." disclaimers.
I'm torn between two perspectives. While I value analytics for understanding audience engagement and fulfilling sponsorship obligations, I appreciate the viewpoint of those prioritizing creative freedom over quantifiable metrics. Om Malik's decision to forgo analytics on his blog, focusing solely on personal satisfaction, is a compelling example.
Syndication to Twitter is particularly problematic. Year-end analytics consistently show minimal traffic from Twitter, despite significant effort invested in tweeting. I justify this by highlighting Twitter's role in industry updates and idea generation.
However, I could achieve these benefits without relying solely on Twitter for link-sharing and commentary. An IndieWeb approach is preferable, but I hesitate due to the added technical complexity and the perceived stylistic differences between tweets and blog posts.
Another IndieWeb component is webmentions, a POST-based system. When you link to someone's site, a webmention POST notifies them, allowing them to manage the interaction (typically saving it and displaying it like a comment). This offers several advantages:
- Centralized discussions: Responses from various platforms (Twitter, other blogs) are collected in one place.
- Promotes self-hosting: Encourages responses on individual websites, fostering a decentralized social web.
For WordPress users, this resembles pingbacks and trackbacks. Webmentions appear simpler and superior, and plugins are available. However, past experiences with pingback/trackback spam raise concerns about potential abuse.
Webmentions are reciprocal. You configure your site to receive POSTs, and ideally, you'd reciprocate by POSTing webmentions to others' sites when referencing their work. While plugins exist, many hand-roll their implementations. Services like Remy's simplify this process, automatically identifying links and sending webmentions.
The beauty of the IndieWeb is its incremental nature. Each step forward offers benefits, and collective adoption enhances the overall experience.
The above is the detailed content of IndieWeb and Webmentions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Here's a container with some child elements:

Flyout menus! The second you need to implement a menu that uses a hover event to display more menu items, you're in tricky territory. For one, they should

"The power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect."- Tim Berners-Lee

In this week's roundup: datepickers are giving keyboard users headaches, a new web component compiler that helps fight FOUC, we finally get our hands on styling list item markers, and four steps to getting webmentions on your site.

The short answer: flex-shrink and flex-basis are probably what you’re lookin’ for.

In this week's look around the world of web platform news, Google Search Console makes it easier to view crawled markup, we learn that custom properties

The IndieWeb is a thing! They've got a conference coming up and everything. The New Yorker is even writing about it:


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.