Let's explore the world of "Static Form Providers." These services handle the backend complexities of your HTML forms, freeing you from the burden of validation, storage, notifications, and API integrations. While often subscription-based (monthly or annual), their cost typically undercuts more comprehensive form builders that include front-end design tools.
This article compares several popular static form providers:
- Kwes
- Basin
- FieldGoal
- Formcarry
- FormKeep
- Formspree
- FormSubmit
- formX
- Getform
- Netlify Forms
Note: Feature comparisons are based on website information and provider confirmations. Thanks to Kwes, FormKeep, Formspree, FormSubmit, formX, and Netlify Forms for verifying details.
Form Construction, Validation & Spam Filtering
Provider | Custom Components | Front-End Validation | Back-End Validation |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Formspree | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FormSubmit | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
formX | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Getform | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Most providers require adding custom HTML attributes to your form elements (text inputs, textareas, etc.). The form's action
attribute points to the provider's URL for submission and processing. FormKeep offers a form designer, but otherwise, styling is your responsibility. Kwes and FormKeep uniquely support custom components. Only Kwes provides front-end and back-end validation, enhancing security. Others rely on HTML5 validation and spam protection.
Provider | Spam Protection |
---|---|
Kwes | AI, Honeypot, Blacklists, Proprietary Tech |
Basin | Akismet, CleanTalk, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
FieldGoal | Provided, details unconfirmed |
FormCarry | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
FormKeep | Provided, details unconfirmed |
Formspree | Akismet, Profanity Filter, Authorized Domains, Custom reCAPTCHA, Honeypot, Custom Filtering |
FormSubmit | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
formX | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Getform | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
Netlify Forms | Akismet, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Kwes boasts a 99.6% spam block rate without extra setup. All providers offer spam protection, employing various methods (reCAPTCHA, Akismet, honeypots, AI). Remember that additional security measures might slightly impact submission rates.
Notifications, Branding & Redirects
Provider | Confirmations | Notifications | Email Routing |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Email confirmations are crucial for user experience. All providers (except FieldGoal) offer confirmations, notifications, and email routing. Some also support alternative notifications (push, Slack).
Provider | White Label | Custom Redirects |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
White labeling allows for branded communications. All providers (except potentially FieldGoal) support this, enhancing brand consistency. Custom redirects improve user flow after submission; most providers offer this (again, FieldGoal's status is unconfirmed).
File Storage, Data Export & API Access
Provider | Upload Storage |
---|---|
Kwes | 200MB/file, 20GB total |
Basin | 100MB/submission |
FieldGoal | Amazon S3 |
FormCarry | 5MB/file, 5GB total |
FormKeep | 2.5GB total |
Formspree | 10MB/file, 10GB total |
FormSubmit | Included, amounts unconfirmed |
formX | ❌ |
Getform | 25MB/submission, 25GB total |
Netlify Forms | 1GB total |
File storage varies significantly. formX lacks this feature. Limits on individual file sizes and total submission sizes are crucial considerations.
Provider | Data Export | API Access |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | On demand |
Getform | ✅ | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
Data export (CSV, JSON) is essential for analysis and integration. Most providers support this. API access is vital for custom integrations; Getform is the exception, while formX offers it on demand.
Webhooks, Zapier & Analytics
Provider | Webhooks | Zapier |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | ✅ |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ❌ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
Webhooks and Zapier integration facilitate third-party connections. FormSubmit is the only provider without Zapier support.
Provider | Analytics |
---|---|
Kwes | ❌ |
Basin | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ❌ |
FormKeep | ✅ |
Formspree | ❌ |
FormSubmit | ❌ |
formX | ✅ |
Getform | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ❌ |
Analytics dashboards provide valuable insights into form performance. This feature is less common, with only Basin, FormKeep, and formX offering it.
Pricing
(Detailed pricing table omitted for brevity, but original table should be included here for completeness. It would be beneficial to summarize key pricing tiers and features across providers).
Conclusion
Static form providers simplify form integration for static sites. Key features include spam protection, email notifications, and data management capabilities. Consider your specific needs (custom components, validation, analytics) when selecting a provider. The author's personal preference is Kwes, highlighting its strengths in spam protection, usability, and comprehensive validation. Remember to thoroughly evaluate your requirements before making a decision.
The above is the detailed content of A Comparison of Static Form Providers. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Linking CSS files to HTML can be achieved by using elements in part of HTML. 1) Use tags to link local CSS files. 2) Multiple CSS files can be implemented by adding multiple tags. 3) External CSS files use absolute URL links, such as. 4) Ensure the correct use of file paths and CSS file loading order, and optimize performance can use CSS preprocessor to merge files.

Choosing Flexbox or Grid depends on the layout requirements: 1) Flexbox is suitable for one-dimensional layouts, such as navigation bar; 2) Grid is suitable for two-dimensional layouts, such as magazine layouts. The two can be used in the project to improve the layout effect.

The best way to include CSS files is to use tags to introduce external CSS files in the HTML part. 1. Use tags to introduce external CSS files, such as. 2. For small adjustments, inline CSS can be used, but should be used with caution. 3. Large projects can use CSS preprocessors such as Sass or Less to import other CSS files through @import. 4. For performance, CSS files should be merged and CDN should be used, and compressed using tools such as CSSNano.

Yes,youshouldlearnbothFlexboxandGrid.1)Flexboxisidealforone-dimensional,flexiblelayoutslikenavigationmenus.2)Gridexcelsintwo-dimensional,complexdesignssuchasmagazinelayouts.3)Combiningbothenhanceslayoutflexibilityandresponsiveness,allowingforstructur

What does it look like to refactor your own code? John Rhea picks apart an old CSS animation he wrote and walks through the thought process of optimizing it.

CSSanimationsarenotinherentlyhardbutrequirepracticeandunderstandingofCSSpropertiesandtimingfunctions.1)Startwithsimpleanimationslikescalingabuttononhoverusingkeyframes.2)Useeasingfunctionslikecubic-bezierfornaturaleffects,suchasabounceanimation.3)For

@keyframesispopularduetoitsversatilityandpowerincreatingsmoothCSSanimations.Keytricksinclude:1)Definingsmoothtransitionsbetweenstates,2)Animatingmultiplepropertiessimultaneously,3)Usingvendorprefixesforbrowsercompatibility,4)CombiningwithJavaScriptfo

CSSCountersareusedtomanageautomaticnumberinginwebdesigns.1)Theycanbeusedfortablesofcontents,listitems,andcustomnumbering.2)Advancedusesincludenestednumberingsystems.3)Challengesincludebrowsercompatibilityandperformanceissues.4)Creativeusesinvolvecust


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
