There are many ways to monitor the use of ZooKeeper memory on CentOS system. This article will introduce several commonly used command line tools and third-party monitoring solutions.
Monitor ZooKeeper memory using system commands
The following command-line tools can view the memory usage of the ZooKeeper process in real time or periodically:
-
top
command: displays the system process resource usage in real time.top -p $(cat /var/run/zookeeper.pid)
This command displays the real-time memory usage of the ZooKeeper process (PID read from
/var/run/zookeeper.pid
file). -
ps
command: Display process details, including memory usage.ps -p $(cat /var/run/zookeeper.pid) -o %mem,%cpu,cmd
This command displays the memory usage percentage, CPU usage percentage of the ZooKeeper process, and the command line.
-
htop
command: interactive process viewer, providing more intuitive resource usage information. (Requires installation:yum install htop
)htop -p $(cat /var/run/zookeeper.pid)
htop
provides a richer interactive interface to monitor the memory usage of the ZooKeeper process. -
vmstat
command: displays system virtual memory statistics. Although the memory usage of ZooKeeper cannot be directly displayed, it can provide the overall memory usage of the system to help determine whether ZooKeeper takes up too much memory.vmstat 1
This command updates the system virtual memory statistics once a second.
-
sar
command: collects and reports system activity information, including memory usage. (May need to install:yum install sysstat
)sar -u 1 5
This command collects CPU usage once a second and displays 5 results. Although the CPU is mainly concerned, other indicators can be combined to assist in judging memory pressure.
Use ZooKeeper's own tools
ZooKeeper itself also provides some monitoring tools:
-
zkServer.sh status
command: Displays the status information of the ZooKeeper server, including memory usage./path/to/zookeeper/bin/zkServer.sh status
Replace
/path/to/zookeeper
with ZooKeeper installation path.
Use third-party monitoring tools (Prometheus and Grafana)
For more advanced monitoring and visualization, Prometheus and Grafana are available:
-
Prometheus and Grafana: Provides more detailed monitoring data and visual interfaces. (Prometheus and Grafana need to be installed separately and configured with the corresponding configuration files.)
The installation steps and configuration process are omitted because this part is relatively lengthy and has nothing to do with the core monitoring method. There are many tutorials on Prometheus and Grafana monitoring ZooKeeper on the Internet.
Which method to choose depends on your monitoring needs and technical level. For simple monitoring, top
or htop
command is sufficient; for more comprehensive monitoring and visualization, Prometheus and Grafana are recommended. The zkServer.sh status
command is provided by ZooKeeper itself and is worth a try.
The above is the detailed content of How to monitor Zookeeper memory usage on CentOS. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

RedHat shut down CentOS8.x and launches CentOSStream because it hopes to provide a platform closer to the RHEL development cycle through the latter. 1. CentOSStream, as the upstream development platform of RHEL, adopts a rolling release mode. 2. This transformation aims to enable the community to get exposure to new RHEL features earlier and provide feedback to accelerate the RHEL development cycle. 3. Users need to adapt to changing systems and reevaluate system requirements and migration strategies.

CentOS stands out among enterprise Linux distributions because of its stability, security, community support and enterprise application advantages. 1. Stability: The update cycle is long and the software package has been strictly tested. 2. Security: Inherit the security features of RHEL, update and announce in a timely manner. 3. Community support: a huge community and detailed documentation to respond to problems quickly. 4. Enterprise applications: Support container technologies such as Docker, suitable for modern application deployment.

Alternatives to CentOS include AlmaLinux, RockyLinux, and OracleLinux. 1.AlmaLinux provides RHEL compatibility and community-driven development. 2. RockyLinux emphasizes enterprise-level support and long-term maintenance. 3. OracleLinux provides Oracle-specific optimization and support. These alternatives have similar stability and compatibility to CentOS, and are suitable for users with different needs.

CentOS is suitable for enterprise and server environments due to its stability and long life cycle. 1.CentOS provides up to 10 years of support, suitable for scenarios that require stable operation. 2.Ubuntu is suitable for environments that require quick updates and user-friendly. 3.Debian is suitable for developers who need pure and free software. 4.Fedora is suitable for users who like to try the latest technologies.

Alternatives to CentOS include AlmaLinux, RockyLinux, and OracleLinux. 1.AlmaLinux and RockyLinux rebuild RHEL 1:1, providing high stability and compatibility, suitable for enterprise environments. 2. OracleLinux provides high performance through UEK, suitable for users who are familiar with the Oracle technology stack. 3. When choosing, stability, community support and package management should be considered.

CentOS alternatives include RockyLinux, AlmaLinux, and OracleLinux. 1. RockyLinux and AlmaLinux provide stable distributions compatible with RHEL, suitable for users who need long-term support. 2. CentOSStream is suitable for users who focus on new features and development cycles. 3. OracleLinux is suitable for users who need enterprise-level support.

CentOS needs alternatives because CentOSStream no longer provides long-term support. Alternative options include: 1. RockyLinux, which provides 10 years of life cycle support, suitable for users who need stability. 2.AlmaLinux also provides 10 years of support and has strong community support. 3. OracleLinux, provides RHEL-compatible version, and flexible life cycle management.

The end of CentOS has had a significant impact on users, with users having the option of RHEL, AlmaLinux, Debian or Ubuntu as alternatives. 1. The migration cost is high, requiring time and money. 2. Community division affects open source projects. 3.RHEL provides commercial support, but it is costly. 4.AlmaLinux is similar to CentOS and has low migration costs. 5. Debian and Ubuntu need more time to adapt.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor
