SVG and canvas are both technologies that can draw stuff in web browsers, so they are worth comparing and understanding when one is more suitable than the other. Even a light understanding of them makes the choice of choosing one over the other pretty clear.
- A little flat-color icon? That’s clearly SVG territory.
- An interactive console-like game? That’s clearly canvas territory.
I know we didn’t cover why yet, but I hope that will become clear as we dig into it.
SVG is vector and declarative
If you know you need vector art, SVG is the choice. Vector art is visually crisp and tends to be a smaller file size than raster graphics like JPG.
That makes logos a very common SVG use case. SVG code can go right within HTML, and are like declarative drawing instructions:
<svg viewbox="0 0 100 100"> <circle cx="50" cy="50" r="50"></circle> </svg>
If you care a lot about the flexibility and responsiveness of the graphic, SVG is the way.
Canvas is a JavaScript drawing API
You put a
<canvas width="578" height="200"></canvas> <script> var canvas = document.getElementById('myCanvas'); var context = canvas.getContext('2d'); var centerX = canvas.width / 2; var centerY = canvas.height / 2; var radius = 70; context.beginPath(); context.arc(centerX, centerY, radius, 0, 2 * Math.PI, false); context.fillStyle = 'green'; context.fill(); </script>
SVG is in the DOM
If you’re familiar with DOM events like click and mouseDown and whatnot, those are available in SVG as well. A You can have a text alternative for canvas: You can do that in SVG too, but since SVG and its guts can be right in the DOM, we generally think of SVG as being what you use if you’re trying to build an accessible experience. Explained another way, you can build an SVG that assistive technology can access and find links and sub-elements with their own auditory explanations and such. Text is also firmly in SVG territory. SVG literally has a As you’ll see in Sarah Dranser’s comparison below, canvas is a way of saying dance, pixels, dance!. That’s a fun way of explaining the concept that drives it home better than any dry technical sentiment could do. Highly interactive work with lots and lots of complex detail and gradients is the territory of canvas. You’ll see a lot more games built with canvas than SVG for this reason, although there are always exceptions (note the simple vector-y-ness of this game). We saw above that SVG can be in the DOM and that JavaScript can get in there and do stuff. The story is similar with CSS. Note how I’ve put the <script> and <style> blocks within the <svg> for these examples, which is valid. But assuming you’ve put the SVG literally in the HTML, you could move those out, or have other external CSS and JavaScript do the same thing. </script> We have a massive guide of SVG Properties and CSS. But what is great to know is that the stuff that CSS is great at is still possible in SVG, like :hover states and animation!
Technically, they aren’t entirely mutually exclusive. A As Blake Bowen proves, you can even keep the SVG on the canvas very crisp!
Tablized from this tweet. Tablized from this tweet. Many folks consider scenarios with a lot of objects (1,000 , as Shirley says) is the territory of canvas. A strong opinion, but it feels right to me: One extremely basic way to answer it is "use canvas when you cannot use svg" (where "cannot" might mean animating thousands of objects, manipulating each pixel individually, etc.). To put it another way, SVG should be your default choice, canvas your backup plan. — Benjamin De Cock (@bdc) October 2, 2019 So, if we revisit those first two bullet points… And yet there is a bunch of middle ground here. As a day-to-day web designer/developer kinda guy, I find SVG far more useful on a practical level. I’m not sure I’ve done any production work in canvas ever. Part of that is because I don’t know canvas nearly as well. I wrote a book on SVG, so I’ve done far more research on that side, but I know enough that SVG is doing the right stuff for my needs.<svg viewbox="0 0 100 100">
<circle cx="50" cy="50" r="50"></circle>
<script>
document.querySelector('circle').addEventListener('click', e => {
e.target.style.fill = "red";
});
</script>
</svg>
SVG for accessibility
<canvas aria-label="Hello ARIA World" role="img"></canvas>
Canvas for pixels
CSS can play with SVG
<svg viewbox="0 0 100 100">
<circle cx="50" cy="50" r="50"></circle>
<style>
circle { fill: blue; }
</style>
</svg>
Combinations
Ruth John’s comparison
Sarah Drasner’s comparison
DOM/Virtual DOM
Canvas
Pros
Great for UI/UX animation
Dance, pixels, dance!
Great for SVG that is resolution independent
Great for really impressive 3D or immersive stuff
Easier to debug
Movement of tons of objects
Cons
Tanks with lots of objects
Harder to make accessible
Because you have to care about the way you anmimate
Not resolution independent out of the box
Breaks to nothing
Shirley Wu’s comparison
SVG
Canvas
Pros
Easy to get started
Very performant
Easier to register user interactions
Easy to update
Easy to animate
Cons
Potentially complex DOM
More work to get started
Not performant for a large number of elements
More work to handle interactions
Have to write custom animations
SVG is the default choice; canvas is the backup
Wrap up
The above is the detailed content of When to Use SVG vs. When to Use Canvas. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The React ecosystem offers us a lot of libraries that all are focused on the interaction of drag and drop. We have react-dnd, react-beautiful-dnd,

There have been some wonderfully interconnected things about fast software lately.

I can't say I use background-clip all that often. I'd wager it's hardly ever used in day-to-day CSS work. But I was reminded of it in a post by Stefan Judis,

Animating with requestAnimationFrame should be easy, but if you haven’t read React’s documentation thoroughly then you will probably run into a few things

Perhaps the easiest way to offer that to the user is a link that targets an ID on the element. So like...

Listen, I am no GraphQL expert but I do enjoy working with it. The way it exposes data to me as a front-end developer is pretty cool. It's like a menu of

In this week's roundup, a handy bookmarklet for inspecting typography, using await to tinker with how JavaScript modules import one another, plus Facebook's

I've recently noticed an interesting change on CodePen: on hovering the pens on the homepage, there's a rectangle with rounded corners expanding in the back.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)