


In the Go crawler framework Colly, how does the thread count setting of Queue and request delay affect the concurrent processing of requests?
The number of Queue threads and request delay of Go language crawler framework Colly
Efficient concurrent request processing is crucial when using the Go crawler framework Colly. This article will dig into how thread count settings and request delays in queue
in Colly affect concurrent processing and answer a common question.
Problem: Interaction between number of threads and request delay
Suppose we set queue
's number of threads to 2:
q, _ := queue.New(2, storage)
And added 3 requests. Meanwhile, colly.Limit()
is used to set the delay of each request to 5 seconds. It is expected that two requests are issued almost simultaneously and respond after 5 seconds, and the third request is delayed by another 5 seconds. However, the actual result is:
- Two requests are created.
- After 5 seconds, the first request responds and a third request is created.
- After 5 seconds, the second request responds.
- After 5 seconds, the third request responds.
This is not processed in parallel. Why does the number of threads of queue
seem to fail? Does colly.Limit()
affect the concurrency of queue
? Is onrequest
callback function just creating a request, not actually making a request?
Analysis: Independence between number of threads and request delay
Colly's queue
manages the number of concurrent requests, while colly.Limit()
sets the delay for each request. The two are independent mechanisms.
The number of threads of queue
limits the number of requests processed simultaneously. colly.Limit()
applies a delay before each request is issued.
In the above case:
-
queue
creates two requests, butcolly.Limit()
makes them both wait for 5 seconds. - The first request is issued after the delay is over. After the response,
queue
releases a thread and creates a third request. - The second request is also sent and responded after waiting for 5 seconds.
- The third request is also sent and responded after waiting for 5 seconds.
Therefore, the request delay masks the concurrency of queue
.
onrequest
callback and request issuance time
onrequest
callback function is fired when the request is added to queue
, not when the request is actually issued. It is used to perform some preprocessing operations before the request is issued.
Conclusion: Coordinate the number of threads and request delays
The delay of colly.Limit()
will affect the concurrency effect of the number of queue
threads. To achieve true concurrency, careful coordination of thread count and request delay settings is required. If high concurrency is required, the delay set by colly.Limit()
should be minimized or removed, or a finer concurrency control mechanism should be considered. If you need to control the crawl speed, it is recommended to use a finer granular control method instead of relying on colly.Limit()
.
The above is the detailed content of In the Go crawler framework Colly, how does the thread count setting of Queue and request delay affect the concurrent processing of requests?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

In Go, using mutexes and locks is the key to ensuring thread safety. 1) Use sync.Mutex for mutually exclusive access, 2) Use sync.RWMutex for read and write operations, 3) Use atomic operations for performance optimization. Mastering these tools and their usage skills is essential to writing efficient and reliable concurrent programs.

How to optimize the performance of concurrent Go code? Use Go's built-in tools such as getest, gobench, and pprof for benchmarking and performance analysis. 1) Use the testing package to write benchmarks to evaluate the execution speed of concurrent functions. 2) Use the pprof tool to perform performance analysis and identify bottlenecks in the program. 3) Adjust the garbage collection settings to reduce its impact on performance. 4) Optimize channel operation and limit the number of goroutines to improve efficiency. Through continuous benchmarking and performance analysis, the performance of concurrent Go code can be effectively improved.

The common pitfalls of error handling in concurrent Go programs include: 1. Ensure error propagation, 2. Processing timeout, 3. Aggregation errors, 4. Use context management, 5. Error wrapping, 6. Logging, 7. Testing. These strategies help to effectively handle errors in concurrent environments.

ImplicitinterfaceimplementationinGoembodiesducktypingbyallowingtypestosatisfyinterfaceswithoutexplicitdeclaration.1)Itpromotesflexibilityandmodularitybyfocusingonbehavior.2)Challengesincludeupdatingmethodsignaturesandtrackingimplementations.3)Toolsli

In Go programming, ways to effectively manage errors include: 1) using error values instead of exceptions, 2) using error wrapping techniques, 3) defining custom error types, 4) reusing error values for performance, 5) using panic and recovery with caution, 6) ensuring that error messages are clear and consistent, 7) recording error handling strategies, 8) treating errors as first-class citizens, 9) using error channels to handle asynchronous errors. These practices and patterns help write more robust, maintainable and efficient code.

Implementing concurrency in Go can be achieved by using goroutines and channels. 1) Use goroutines to perform tasks in parallel, such as enjoying music and observing friends at the same time in the example. 2) Securely transfer data between goroutines through channels, such as producer and consumer models. 3) Avoid excessive use of goroutines and deadlocks, and design the system reasonably to optimize concurrent programs.

Gooffersmultipleapproachesforbuildingconcurrentdatastructures,includingmutexes,channels,andatomicoperations.1)Mutexesprovidesimplethreadsafetybutcancauseperformancebottlenecks.2)Channelsofferscalabilitybutmayblockiffullorempty.3)Atomicoperationsareef

Go'serrorhandlingisexplicit,treatingerrorsasreturnedvaluesratherthanexceptions,unlikePythonandJava.1)Go'sapproachensureserrorawarenessbutcanleadtoverbosecode.2)PythonandJavauseexceptionsforcleanercodebutmaymisserrors.3)Go'smethodpromotesrobustnessand


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.
