


Why in Go language, the value returned by the cap function after slicing operation is 6 instead of 5?
Detailed explanation of the Go slicing capacity growth mechanism: Why is cap(s) 6 instead of 5?
This article discusses the reason why the return value of cap
function is greater than the slice length after slicing operation in Go. The following example shows the changes in slice length ( len
) and capacity ( cap
) after the append
operation:
package main import "fmt" func main() { var s []int printSlice(s) // len=0 cap=0 [] s = append(s, 0) printSlice(s) // len=1 cap=1 [0] s = append(s, 1) printSlice(s) // len=2 cap=2 [0 1] s = append(s, 2, 3, 4) printSlice(s) // len=5 cap=6 [0 1 2 3 4] } func printSlice(s []int) { fmt.Printf("len=%d cap=%d %v\n", len(s), cap(s), s) }
After adding elements 2, 3, 4, len(s)
is 5, but cap(s)
becomes 6. This is because the slicing underlying implementation of Go language adopts a growth strategy designed to balance memory usage and performance. Go will not allocate just enough memory every time, because frequent memory allocation and data copying will reduce efficiency.
The slicing capacity growth strategy of Go language does not grow linearly. The specific algorithm is defined in the Go source code and may vary by version. Generally speaking, capacity will increase in a certain proportion (for example, doubling or calculated according to a certain formula) to reduce the frequency of reallocating memory when append
again in the future. In the example, capacity grows from 2 to 6, a common growth strategy that reserves additional space to avoid frequent triggering of memory redistribution when a small number of elements is added, thereby improving performance. This complies with the principle of cap >= len
, ensuring that the slice always has enough capacity to accommodate more elements.
(Image description: Schematic diagram of the capacity growth of Go language, showing the nonlinear growth of capacity)
In short, cap(s)
is 6 instead of 5, which is a pre-allocation strategy adopted by Go to optimize performance, not a mistake. This strategy can improve program efficiency in most cases and avoid frequent memory allocation and data copying.
The above is the detailed content of Why in Go language, the value returned by the cap function after slicing operation is 6 instead of 5?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

In what aspects are Golang and Python easier to use and have a smoother learning curve? Golang is more suitable for high concurrency and high performance needs, and the learning curve is relatively gentle for developers with C language background. Python is more suitable for data science and rapid prototyping, and the learning curve is very smooth for beginners.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent programming, while C is more suitable for projects that require extreme performance and underlying control. 1) Golang's concurrency model simplifies concurrency programming through goroutine and channel. 2) C's template programming provides generic code and performance optimization. 3) Golang's garbage collection is convenient but may affect performance. C's memory management is complex but the control is fine.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function