The difference between commit and push of git

Git's Commit and Push Difference

git commit and git push are two fundamental Git commands, but they operate at different stages of the development workflow. Understanding their differences is crucial for effective version control. git commit saves changes to your local repository, while git push uploads those committed changes to a remote repository (like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket). Think of it like writing a letter (git commit) and then mailing it (git push). The letter is ready, but it's not shared until you mail it.

What are the key differences between git commit and git push in terms of their actions on local and remote repositories?

git commit stages changes in your local working directory and saves them as a snapshot in your local Git repository's history. This creates a new commit object containing the changes, a timestamp, and a commit message describing the changes. This action only affects your local repository; no one else can see these changes yet. The changes are saved locally, allowing you to revert, review, and continue working without affecting anyone else's copies of the project.

git push, on the other hand, uploads the commits from your local repository to a remote repository. This makes your changes visible and accessible to others who have access to that remote repository. It essentially synchronizes your local commits with the remote repository. Without git push, your local commits remain private and only accessible on your machine. Crucially, git push requires a remote repository to be configured; it won't work if you haven't linked your local repository to a remote one.

How does git commit prepare my changes for sharing, and what role does git push play in actually sharing them with others?

git commit prepares your changes for sharing by creating a permanent record of those changes within your local repository. It captures the state of your project at a specific point in time, allowing you to track progress and revert to previous versions if necessary. The commit message acts as documentation, explaining the purpose of the changes made in that commit. This structured approach to saving changes is essential for collaboration and maintaining a clear history of your project's evolution. However, the commit itself is only local.

git push is the mechanism that shares those prepared changes with collaborators. It transmits the new commits (and any associated files) from your local repository to the designated remote repository. This action makes the changes accessible to other developers working on the same project. Without git push, your meticulous commits remain isolated on your local machine, invisible to the rest of the team.

When should I use git commit without immediately following with git push, and what are the benefits of this approach?

There are several scenarios where committing without immediately pushing is beneficial:

• Work-in-progress: If you're working on a feature that's not yet complete or stable, you can commit your changes regularly to save your progress locally. This creates checkpoints in your local history allowing you to revert to earlier versions if needed, without affecting the shared project. You can then push once the feature is complete and tested.
• Atomic commits: Committing frequently allows for smaller, more focused commits, making it easier to review changes and understand the project's history. This improves code readability and maintainability. Pushing multiple small commits might clutter the shared repository history, so consolidating them before pushing is often preferable.
• Offline work: You can commit changes even without an internet connection. Once you regain connectivity, you can push your commits to the remote repository.
• Testing and debugging: You can commit changes, test them locally, and make further commits without affecting the shared repository. If issues arise, you can easily revert to previous commits without impacting your team.
• Maintaining a clean shared history: Consolidating related commits locally before pushing can lead to a more organized and understandable project history in the shared repository.

In summary, committing without immediately pushing provides a level of local control and flexibility, allowing for more refined development and a cleaner shared repository history. It’s a best practice to commit often, but to strategically push when the changes are ready for sharing.

The above is the detailed content of The difference between commit and push of git. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!