The difference between add and commit of git

Understanding git add and git commit: Key Differences

git add and git commit are two fundamental commands in Git, both crucial for managing changes to your project. However, they serve distinct purposes in the workflow. git add prepares changes for a commit, while git commit actually saves those prepared changes to the Git repository's history. Think of git add as a staging area, where you select which modifications you want to include in your next commit. git commit then takes those staged changes and creates a permanent snapshot of your project at that point in time. This two-step process allows for granular control over what is included in each commit, leading to cleaner, more organized version history. You can selectively add files, specific changes within files (using git add -p for interactive staging), or even remove files from the staging area before committing. This contrasts with a hypothetical single-step system where all changes would be committed atomically, which would severely limit control and flexibility.

git add and git commit: Functionality Differences

The core difference lies in their function within the Git workflow. git add stages changes. This means it moves modifications from your working directory (the files you're actively editing) to the staging area. The staging area is a temporary holding place for changes that you intend to include in your next commit. Once changes are staged, they are ready to be committed.

git commit, on the other hand, takes the staged changes and creates a new commit object in your Git repository. This commit object contains a snapshot of your project's state at that specific moment, along with a commit message that describes the changes made. Critically, only the staged changes are included in the commit; unstaged changes are left untouched. This allows for creating commits that focus on specific, logical units of work, rather than haphazardly including all changes made since the last commit.

To illustrate: imagine you've made three changes to your project (changed three files). You can git add one file, then git commit. Later, you can git add the other two files and git commit again, resulting in two separate commits, each focused on a subset of the changes.

How Staging with git add Affects git commit

Staging with git add directly determines the content of the subsequent git commit. Only files and changes that have been staged using git add will be included in the commit. This is a crucial aspect of Git's power and flexibility. You can:

• Partially stage changes: Use git add -p (patch mode) to selectively stage only portions of a modified file. This is extremely useful when dealing with large changesets, allowing you to break them down into smaller, more manageable commits.
• Stage multiple files independently: You can stage different files or changes to different files in separate git add commands before committing, creating more focused and understandable commits.
• Unstage changes: If you've mistakenly added something to the staging area, you can remove it using git reset HEAD <file> before committing, giving you complete control over what ends up in each commit.

Essentially, git add acts as a filter, allowing you to carefully curate the changes that are saved in your project's history with each git commit.

Importance of Using Both git add and git commit

Using both git add and git commit is vital for effective Git workflow because it promotes a structured and organized version history. This is beneficial for several reasons:

• Atomic commits: Each commit represents a single, logical unit of work. This makes it much easier to understand the evolution of your project and to revert to earlier states if necessary. Without staging, your commits would be large and potentially messy, making it hard to track down the source of problems.
• Collaborative development: When working with others, clear, concise commits are essential for effective collaboration. They facilitate code review and make it easier to understand the contributions of individual developers.
• Easier debugging: If a bug is introduced, the well-structured commits make it much simpler to identify the commit that introduced the issue, allowing for efficient debugging and rollback.
• Improved code quality: The practice of carefully staging changes before committing encourages more thoughtful code development. This often leads to better code design and fewer errors.

In short, while technically you could commit all changes directly (though Git doesn't directly support this), the two-step process of staging with git add and then committing with git commit is a cornerstone of effective Git usage. It allows for fine-grained control over the version history, resulting in a more manageable, understandable, and ultimately more robust project.

The above is the detailed content of The difference between add and commit of git. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!