This article explores the performance benefits of DOM caching within a common JavaScript namespacing pattern. A jsperf test demonstrates a significant speed improvement—up to 76%—when caching DOM elements.
The test highlights the dramatic performance boost achieved by caching, particularly evident in a comparison where operations per second increased from 32,889 to 602,620.
The 76% speed increase (calculated as ((98,072-23,358)/98,072)*100) is based on operations per second.
Here's a sample HTML structure used in the testing:
<ul id="container"> <li class="nested">nested 1</li> <li class="nested">nested 2</li> <li class="nested">nested 3</li> </ul> <ul id="container"></ul> <ul id="container"></ul> <div id="status"></div>
And the corresponding JavaScript code with a caching mechanism:
MY_OBJECT = { cache: {}, init: function() { this.cache.c = $('#container'); this.cache.n = this.cache.c.find('.nested'); this.cache.s = this.cache.c.find('#status'); } }; MY_OBJECT.init(); // Test cases (comparing cached vs. non-cached operations) are omitted for brevity but included in the original. They demonstrate the performance gains of caching.
Frequently Asked Questions about jQuery Performance and DOM Caching
This section answers common questions about DOM caching, its importance, implementation, potential pitfalls, and comparisons with other optimization techniques. The original FAQ section is retained, but rephrased for conciseness and clarity. The key points remain the same: DOM caching significantly improves performance by reducing redundant DOM manipulations, but requires careful management to avoid stale data. It's compatible with other libraries and can be combined with server-side caching for maximum efficiency. Measuring the impact can be done using browser developer tools. Alternatives exist, but DOM caching remains a powerful optimization strategy.
The above is the detailed content of jQuery: The Performance of DOM caching. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
