Modern web development relies heavily on AJAX requests. While the native XMLHttpRequest
object provides this functionality, many developers prefer using libraries like jQuery for simpler AJAX handling. This article compares two popular alternatives: superagent and axios, demonstrating their capabilities through requests to a sample HTTP service.
Key Differences:
- Both superagent and axios offer asynchronous AJAX capabilities, allowing other code to execute concurrently.
- Axios leverages Promises, aligning with standard JavaScript practices, while superagent uses a different approach. This makes axios more seamlessly integrable with other promise-based libraries.
- Both are well-suited for basic GET, POST, and PUT requests to APIs but lack features like upload progress monitoring found in modern
XMLHttpRequest
. - While functionally similar, the author finds superagent's API more intuitive. However, if Promise integration is crucial, axios is the preferred choice.
XMLHttpRequest
remains a viable option for developers comfortable managing browser compatibility or targeting modern browsers only.
Library Introduction:
XMLHttpRequest
supports both synchronous and asynchronous requests. Since JavaScript is single-threaded, synchronous requests block execution, making asynchronous requests the practical choice. Both axios and superagent exclusively perform asynchronous requests. Because the request happens in the background, the response isn't immediately available. A callback function handles the response once it's received.
Axios uses Promises to manage this process, offering better integration with other asynchronous code. Superagent's API doesn't adhere to standard Promise patterns. This makes axios a more robust option when working with multiple libraries or custom Promises. Superagent, however, boasts wider recognition and a small but useful plugin ecosystem (e.g., for URL prefixing).
Both libraries excel at basic API interaction (GET, POST, PUT), but lack advanced features like upload progress tracking available in modern XMLHttpRequest
. Their primary benefit lies in their concise, chainable API for request configuration and execution.
Installation:
XMLHttpRequest
requires no installation; it's built into modern browsers (IE8 and later). Superagent is an npm module, requiring npm (included with Node.js/io.js) and a client-side packaging tool like browserify. Axios is available as an npm module, an AMD module, and a standalone JavaScript file.
Example API (Bakery Order Management):
This example uses a hypothetical bakery order management API:
-
GET
/orders?start=YYYY-MM-DD&end=YYYY-MM-DD
: Retrieves orders within a date range. -
POST
/orders
: Creates a new order.
Data is exchanged in JSON format. For example, to order 3 chocolate and 5 lemon cakes for delivery on March 10th (order placed on May 4th):
{ "chocolate": "3", "lemon": "5", "delivery": "2015-03-10", "placed": "2015-03-04" }
Creating a New Order:
This requires specifying the HTTP method (POST), URL (/orders
), request body (order details), and content type (application/json
).
- Superagent:
var request = require('superagent'); request.post('/orders/') .send({'chocolate': 2, 'placed': '2015-04-26'}) .type('application/json') .accept('json') .end(function(err, res) { if (err) { console.log('Error!'); } else { console.log(res.body); } });
- Axios:
axios.post( '/orders/', { chocolate: 2, placed: '2015-04-26' }, { headers: { 'Content-type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json' } } ) .then(function(response) { console.log(response.data); }) .catch(function(response) { console.log('Error!'); });
- XMLHttpRequest:
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.open('POST', '/orders/', true); xhr.setRequestHeader('Content-type', 'application/json'); xhr.setRequestHeader('Accept', 'application/json'); xhr.onload = function() { if (xhr.status >= 200 && xhr.status < 300) { console.log(xhr.response); } else { console.log('Error!'); } }; xhr.send(JSON.stringify({chocolate: 2, placed: '2015-04-26'}));
Retrieving Orders by Date Range:
This involves adding query parameters (start
and end
).
- Superagent:
request.get('/orders') .query({start: '2015-04-22', end: '2015-04-29'}) .accept('json') .end(function(err, res) { // Handle error and response });
- Axios:
axios.get( '/orders', { headers: { 'Accept': 'application/json' }, params: { start: '2015-04-22', end: '2015-04-29' } } );
- XMLHttpRequest:
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.open('GET', '/orders?start=' + encodeURIComponent('2015-04-22') + '&end=' + encodeURIComponent('2015-04-29'), true); // ...rest of the code
Recommendations and Conclusion:
Axios and superagent offer similar functionality, with axios's Promise-based approach being a key differentiator. Superagent provides a more streamlined API, but axios's adherence to Promises makes it more versatile. XMLHttpRequest
remains a valid option for developers comfortable managing browser-specific nuances. The choice depends on project needs and developer preference. A GitHub repository (link not provided in input) likely contains the complete code examples. The remainder of the input text consists of frequently asked questions and answers which are not included in this output for brevity.
The above is the detailed content of A Comparison of JavaScript HTTP Libraries for the Browser. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools
