Home >Backend Development >C++ >Task.Wait vs. await: When Does Asynchronous Waiting Lead to Deadlock?
C#asynchronous programming: the deadlock risk of task.wait and await
In C#asynchronous programming, understanding the difference between
and is very important. Both are used to synchronize asynchronous operations, but the impact of realizing thread behavior is very different. Task.Wait
await
For example, if a
to wait for multiple tasks to complete, this synchronous obstruction method may lead to dead locks. Because the method and the asynchronous task it are waiting for on the same thread. The thread cannot continue asynchronous tasks after blocking, causing dead locks. GET
Task.WaitAll
On the contrary, is an asynchronous waiting mechanism. When encountering GET
expressions, the method containing it will "pause" and return an unfinished task to the caller. This allows the caller to continue execution, while
await
In short, await
synchronize the current thread, and it may cause dead locks when used with asynchronous tasks; await
asynchronous waiting, will not block the thread, avoid dead locks and allow other tasks to execute concurrently. In order to avoid dead locks in the asynchronous scene, it is recommended to use the "full asynchronous" strategy and use await
as the preferred mechanism for synchronous asynchronous operations.
The above is the detailed content of Task.Wait vs. await: When Does Asynchronous Waiting Lead to Deadlock?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!