Why Does My C# Ternary Operator Fail with Nullable Types: `GetBoolValue() ? 10 : null`?

C# Nullable Types and the Ternary Operator: Resolving Type Inconsistencies

In C#, using the ternary operator (? :) with nullable types (like int?) can lead to the error "Type of conditional expression cannot be determined...". This occurs when the true and false branches of the ternary operator have incompatible types. For example, GetBoolValue() ? 10 : null fails because 10 is an int and null represents the absence of a value. The compiler can't decide on a single type for the expression.

The problem stems from the ternary operator's need for a consistent return type. While null can be assigned to a nullable integer (int?), a plain int cannot implicitly become an int?.

Here are several ways to correct this:

1. Explicit Cast to Nullable Integer: Cast the integer literal to int?:

   <code class="language-csharp">x = GetBoolValue() ? (int?)10 : null;</code>

2. Explicit Null Conversion: Explicitly cast null to int?:

   <code class="language-csharp">x = GetBoolValue() ? 10 : (int?)null;</code>

3. Using the default Keyword: The default keyword provides a type-safe way to get the default value for a type, which is null for nullable types:

   <code class="language-csharp">x = GetBoolValue() ? 10 : default(int?);</code>

These solutions ensure type consistency, allowing the compiler to correctly infer the type of the ternary expression as int?, thus resolving the compilation error. Choose the method that best suits your coding style and readability preferences.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does My C# Ternary Operator Fail with Nullable Types: `GetBoolValue() ? 10 : null`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!