Why I Migrated My Laravel App to AWS Serverless (And Why It Could Save You Time and Money)

---

Spoiler Alert: It's not just about cost savings (although my bank account appreciates it!).

---

Imagine this: You've crafted a stunning Laravel application – your masterpiece, a versatile tool brimming with features. But there's a snag. You're paying monthly for an underutilized EC2 instance, and scaling feels like wrestling an octopus.

Sound familiar? It did to me.

Three years ago, I took a leap of faith: I deployed PHP on AWS Lambda. The reaction? "PHP on serverless? Heresy!"

Yet, here I am, three years later, a convert. Let me explain why a serverless Laravel architecture is the cloud upgrade you never knew you needed.

---

1. The Challenges of Traditional Laravel Hosting

(or: Why my EC2 instances were experiencing an existential crisis)

Before serverless, my Laravel app resided on EC2. For the uninitiated, EC2 is Amazon's virtual private server offering. It seemed ideal until the realities hit:

a) The Constant Cost

Running an EC2 instance is like owning a perpetually running car. My app wasn't always busy, but the costs kept accumulating. Between EC2 instances, load balancers, and storage, I was spending approximately $110/month on a largely idle system. My budget? Not amused.

I know, it's not a fortune, but for a solo developer, every dollar counts.

b) Scaling Nightmares

EC2 instances are unpredictable. A traffic surge? Crash. Low traffic? Still burning money. Managing autoscaling was a constant struggle.

c) Unexpected DevOps Responsibilities

Laravel development unexpectedly included sysadmin tasks: patching, debugging server configurations at odd hours—not my ideal workflow.

---

That's when I explored serverless, a solution that addressed these issues perfectly.

---

2. AWS Serverless: PHP's Cloud Transformation

Let's clarify: Serverless doesn't mean no servers. It means AWS handles the server management. I focus on coding.

a) Lambda: The On-Demand Execution Engine

AWS Lambda is an event-driven compute service. It executes code in response to events (HTTP requests, etc.) and disappears when finished.

• No idle costs: Pay only for execution time.
• Effortless scaling: Lambda automatically scales to handle traffic spikes.
• Stateless architecture: A clean slate for each execution, promoting modular design.

b) Managed Services: The Supporting Cast

Serverless leverages a suite of managed services:

• Database: Aurora Serverless (MySQL/Postgres) for SQL databases.
• Storage: S3 for scalable file storage.
• Message Queues: SQS for asynchronous task processing.

c) Addressing the PHP Challenges

PHP wasn't initially designed for serverless. Adapting Laravel required changes:

• Sessions: Migrate to an external database (MySQL, Redis).
• File Storage: Use S3 via Laravel's Storage facade.
• Queue Handling: Utilize SQS as the queue driver.
• Caching: Employ Redis or DynamoDB.
• Boot Time Optimization: Minimize cold starts by removing unnecessary dependencies.
• Configuration Management: Use AWS Secrets Manager or Parameter Store for secure configuration.

---

Serverless isn't just about replacing servers; it's about architectural rethinking.

---

3. Unleashing Laravel's Potential with Serverless

Does serverless Laravel deliver? Absolutely. It solves traditional hosting problems while offering faster, more scalable, and cost-effective solutions.

a) Cold Starts: Managing Expectations

Cold starts (Lambda initializing a new instance) are manageable:

• Reality: Typical cold starts are ~3-5 seconds.
• Solutions: Laravel Octane (keeps the app alive), Provisioned Concurrency (pre-warms instances).

For most apps, brief delays are acceptable, especially during peak traffic.

b) Effortless Scaling

Scaling is automatic. A viral app? Lambda handles the surge without intervention.

c) Cost Savings: The Bottom Line

My EC2 costs were ~$110/month. My Lambda costs? ~$34/month (a 70% reduction!).

**Resource**	**EC2 Cost**	**Lambda Cost**
Compute	.00	.50
Networking (LB, API Gateway)	.40	.30
Storage	.80	.90
Database	.00	.00
**TOTAL**	**0.20**	**~.70**

Serverless saves money and frees up mental energy.

Note: I initially used a MySQL instance. Future posts will explore DynamoDB for further cost optimization.

d) Maintenance Freedom: The Liberation

Serverless eliminates server maintenance:

• Automatic updates.
• Simplified configurations.
• Elastic capacity.
• Focus on features, not firefighting.

---

4. Is Serverless Laravel Right for You?

Serverless isn't for every app. Its stateless nature requires architectural adjustments. Consider these factors:

a) Statelessness: Adaptations Required

Laravel's stateful operations need adaptation: sessions, files, logs, configuration, and queues.

b) Vendor Lock-in

AWS services are proprietary. Migration to other platforms requires effort.

c) When to Avoid Serverless

Avoid serverless for: WebSockets, heavy computational workloads, and applications relying heavily on persistent server state.

---

5. What's Next?

Serverless Laravel offers significant advantages. Stay tuned for Part 2, detailing the implementation steps.

---

Your Thoughts: What are your biggest serverless concerns? Share them below! I'll address the top three in Part 2.

The above is the detailed content of Why I Migrated My Laravel App to AWS Serverless (And Why It Could Save You Time and Money). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!