


Can EF Core Code for Selecting Custom DTOs from Child Properties Be Reused Efficiently?
Can Code for Selecting a Custom DTO Object for a Child Property Be Reused with EF Core?
Entity Framework Core enables querying using expressions to convert to DTO objects. This functionality works well for the object and any child collections, as exemplified by the provided Model:
public class Model { public int ModelId { get; set; } public string ModelName { get; set; } public virtual ICollection<childmodel> ChildModels { get; set; } // Other properties, collections, etc. public static Expression<func modeldto>> AsDto => model => new ModelDto { ModelId = model.ModelId, ModelName = model.ModelName, ChildModels = model.ChildModels.AsQueryable().Select(ChildModel.AsDto).ToList() }; }</func></childmodel>
And the Query:
dbContext.Models.Where(m => SomeCriteria).Select(Model.AsDto).ToList();
However, the question arises: how can similar behavior be achieved for a child entity that is not a collection? For instance, if the Model class includes the property:
public AnotherChildModel AnotherChildModel { get; set; }
A conversion can be added to the expression:
public static Expression<func modeldto>> AsDto => model => new ModelDto { ModelId = model.ModelId, ModelName = model.ModelName, ChildModels = model.ChildModels.AsQueryable().Select(ChildModel.AsDto).ToList(), AnotherChildModel = new AnotherChildModelDto { AnotherChildModelId = model.AnotherChildModelId } };</func>
But repeating this code every time the second child model needs to be converted to a DTO object is undesirable. Is there an alternative to using .Select() for a single entity?
Solutions
Several libraries offer an intuitive solution to this problem:
1. LINQKit:
With LINQKit, the .Select() operation can be applied to individual entities using the ExpandableAttribute:
[Expandable(nameof(AsDtoImpl))] public static ModelDto AsDto(Model model) { _asDtoImpl ??= AsDtoImpl() .Compile(); return _asDtoImpl(model); } private static Func<model modeldto> _asDtoImpl; private static Expression<func modeldto>> AsDtoImpl => model => new ModelDto { ModelId = model.ModelId, ModelName = model.ModelName, ChildModels = model.ChildModels.AsQueryable().Select(ChildModel.AsDto).ToList(), AnotherChildModel = new AnotherChildModelDto { AnotherChildModelId = model.AnotherChildModelId } };</func></model>
The query can then be written as:
dbContext.Models .Where(m => SomeCriteria).Select(m => Model.AsDto(m)) .AsExpandable() .ToList();
2. NeinLinq:
Similar to LINQKit, NeinLinq utilizes the InjectLambda attribute:
[InjectLambda] public static ModelDto AsDto(Model model) { _asDto ??= AsDto() .Compile(); return _asDto(model); } private static Func<model modeldto> _asDto; private static Expression<func modeldto>> AsDto => model => new ModelDto { ModelId = model.ModelId, ModelName = model.ModelName, ChildModels = model.ChildModels.AsQueryable().Select(ChildModel.AsDto).ToList(), AnotherChildModel = new AnotherChildModelDto { AnotherChildModelId = model.AnotherChildModelId } };</func></model>
The query can be modified as follows:
dbContext.Models .Where(m => SomeCriteria).Select(m => Model.AsDto(m)) .ToInjectable() .ToList();
3. DelegateDecompiler:
DelegateDecompiler offers a concise approach using the Computed attribute:
[Computed] public static ModelDto AsDto(Model model) => new ModelDto { ModelId = model.ModelId, ModelName = model.ModelName, ChildModels = model.ChildModels.AsQueryable().Select(ChildModel.AsDto).ToList(), AnotherChildModel = new AnotherChildModelDto { AnotherChildModelId = model.AnotherChildModelId } }
The query can be simplified to:
dbContext.Models .Where(m => SomeCriteria).Select(m => Model.AsDto(m)) .Decompile() .ToList();
Each of these libraries accomplishes the goal by modifying the expression tree before EF Core processing, thereby avoiding the need for repeated code. Additionally, all three require a call to inject their respective IQueryProvider.
The above is the detailed content of Can EF Core Code for Selecting Custom DTOs from Child Properties Be Reused Efficiently?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Mastering polymorphisms in C can significantly improve code flexibility and maintainability. 1) Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same base type. 2) Implement runtime polymorphism through inheritance and virtual functions. 3) Polymorphism supports code extension without modifying existing classes. 4) Using CRTP to implement compile-time polymorphism can improve performance. 5) Smart pointers help resource management. 6) The base class should have a virtual destructor. 7) Performance optimization requires code analysis first.

C destructorsprovideprecisecontroloverresourcemanagement,whilegarbagecollectorsautomatememorymanagementbutintroduceunpredictability.C destructors:1)Allowcustomcleanupactionswhenobjectsaredestroyed,2)Releaseresourcesimmediatelywhenobjectsgooutofscop

Integrating XML in a C project can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parse and generate XML files using pugixml or TinyXML library, 2) select DOM or SAX methods for parsing, 3) handle nested nodes and multi-level properties, 4) optimize performance using debugging techniques and best practices.

XML is used in C because it provides a convenient way to structure data, especially in configuration files, data storage and network communications. 1) Select the appropriate library, such as TinyXML, pugixml, RapidXML, and decide according to project needs. 2) Understand two ways of XML parsing and generation: DOM is suitable for frequent access and modification, and SAX is suitable for large files or streaming data. 3) When optimizing performance, TinyXML is suitable for small files, pugixml performs well in memory and speed, and RapidXML is excellent in processing large files.

The main differences between C# and C are memory management, polymorphism implementation and performance optimization. 1) C# uses a garbage collector to automatically manage memory, while C needs to be managed manually. 2) C# realizes polymorphism through interfaces and virtual methods, and C uses virtual functions and pure virtual functions. 3) The performance optimization of C# depends on structure and parallel programming, while C is implemented through inline functions and multithreading.

The DOM and SAX methods can be used to parse XML data in C. 1) DOM parsing loads XML into memory, suitable for small files, but may take up a lot of memory. 2) SAX parsing is event-driven and is suitable for large files, but cannot be accessed randomly. Choosing the right method and optimizing the code can improve efficiency.

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
