Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Prefer 'variable != null' over 'null != variable' in C#?
Why use "null != variable" instead of "variable != null" in C#?
In C#, you often see the use of "null != variable" instead of "variable != null" in conditional statements. This may raise questions about the difference in execution speed or the advantage of the former.
Execution speed difference
In C#, the order of operands in a conditional statement does not affect execution speed. "null != variable" and "variable != null" evaluate to the same result and have the same computational cost.
Legacy issues of C language
The reason for using "null != variable" stems from historical habits in the C programming language. In C, the assignment operator ("=") and the equality comparison operator ("==") have different precedence, which can lead to unexpected behavior if the operands are not in the correct order.
C language example:
<code class="language-c">if (x = 5) // 赋值,结果为真</code>
To avoid this situation, C programmers often use the reverse form "if (5 == x)" to ensure correct behavior.
This problem does not exist in C#
In C#, "==" has higher precedence than "=". This removes potential ambiguity and eliminates the need to use "null != variable" for correctness.
Advantages of "variable != null"
Using "variable != null" has several advantages over "null != variable":
Therefore, for clarity and in line with best practices, it is recommended to use "variable != null" instead of "null != variable" in C#.
The above is the detailed content of Why Prefer 'variable != null' over 'null != variable' in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!