In this case study, I’ll explore a detailed comparison between these two AI models, based on their performance, pricing, and specific use cases, drawing insights from community feedback, benchmarks, and personal experience.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Intelligent and Human-like
What is Claude?
Claude is an AI assistant developed by Anthropic, with an emphasis on ethical and human-like interactions. It’s powered by a large language model, and its development was influenced by former OpenAI members. Claude’s “Constitutional AI” approach aims to provide AI that is more aligned with human values.
Claude’s Key Features:
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet is considered the most intelligent in the Claude 3.5 family, excelling in logical reasoning and handling creative tasks.
- The model is designed for tasks such as summarization, research, writing, and decision-making.
- Claude 3.5 is free for use with limited features, but users can upgrade to paid plans for extended functionality.
Usage Insights:
Claude 3.5 Sonnet shines in areas requiring human-like interactions and creative solutions. For instance, in personal tests, it generated highly creative and non-generic responses to prompts.
However, it lags slightly in specialized areas such as mathematical problem-solving and complex reasoning, where it shows lower accuracy than GPT-4o.
GPT-4o: Omni-Capable and Fast
What is GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is OpenAI’s latest AI model, offering a versatile approach to processing various types of input—text, audio, image, and video. The "o" in GPT-4o stands for "omni," underscoring its multimodal capabilities. This model is trained to handle complex tasks, from advanced reasoning to problem-solving across diverse domains.
GPT-4o’s Key Features:
- GPT-4o excels in providing fast and accurate responses across different media types, including audio and video.
- It supports complex problem-solving in fields like math, science, and coding, making it ideal for tasks that require deep analytical thinking.
- It is available through OpenAI’s ChatGPT subscription service at $20/month, with API access priced at $2.50 per million tokens.
Usage Insights:
For complex tasks, GPT-4o’s performance outshines many competitors. In benchmarks, GPT-4o scored higher in areas like mathematical problem-solving, reasoning, and speed. It’s particularly useful for users requiring fast responses and multi-input-output capabilities.
Benchmarking the Models: Key Comparisons
1. Graduate-Level Reasoning (GPQA, Diamond Benchmark):
The GPQA benchmark evaluates AI's ability to handle graduate-level reasoning.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 59.4% accuracy on zero-shot CoT tasks.
- GPT-4o: 53.6% accuracy on zero-shot CoT tasks.
Conclusion: Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels in graduate-level reasoning.
2. Math Problem-Solving (MATH Benchmark):
In complex math problem-solving, GPT-4o performs better.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 71.1% accuracy on zero-shot CoT.
- GPT-4o: 76.6% accuracy on zero-shot CoT.
Conclusion: GPT-4o is superior for math-heavy tasks.
3. Latency and Speed:
Speed and latency are crucial for real-time applications.
- GPT-4o: Average latency is 24% faster than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Slightly slower, with longer time to first token and fewer output tokens.
Conclusion: GPT-4o leads in speed and responsiveness.
4. Accuracy in Contextual Understanding:
To test contextual accuracy, I compared the models' ability to respond to a prompt about “Pwn Request for GitHub Actions.”
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Provided an incorrect response.
- GPT-4o: Correctly identified it as a vulnerability.
Conclusion: GPT-4o is more accurate in delivering contextually relevant answers.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet:
- Free version available with usage limits (around 10 prompts).
- Paid API pricing: $3 per million tokens for input, $15 per million tokens for output.
- Claude Pro plan: $18 per month for additional features.
GPT-4o (via OpenAI):
- ChatGPT Plus: $20/month for full access.
- API pricing: $2.50 per million tokens for input.
Conclusion:
Claude offers more flexibility in terms of cost for basic use, while GPT-4o is more suited for professionals needing high-level capabilities and rapid output.
Final Thoughts: Which Model to Choose?
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if:
You need an AI that offers creative and human-like responses. It’s ideal for tasks requiring empathy, conversation, and logical problem-solving, such as writing, brainstorming, and summarizing content.Choose GPT-4o if:
You need a high-performance AI for complex tasks involving math, coding, and advanced reasoning. GPT-4o is more robust for professionals dealing with intricate, multi-modal tasks and real-time applications.
Read full article here
The above is the detailed content of Claude Sonnet vs. GPT-4o. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Detailed explanation of JavaScript string replacement method and FAQ This article will explore two ways to replace string characters in JavaScript: internal JavaScript code and internal HTML for web pages. Replace string inside JavaScript code The most direct way is to use the replace() method: str = str.replace("find","replace"); This method replaces only the first match. To replace all matches, use a regular expression and add the global flag g: str = str.replace(/fi

Leverage jQuery for Effortless Web Page Layouts: 8 Essential Plugins jQuery simplifies web page layout significantly. This article highlights eight powerful jQuery plugins that streamline the process, particularly useful for manual website creation

So here you are, ready to learn all about this thing called AJAX. But, what exactly is it? The term AJAX refers to a loose grouping of technologies that are used to create dynamic, interactive web content. The term AJAX, originally coined by Jesse J

This post compiles helpful cheat sheets, reference guides, quick recipes, and code snippets for Android, Blackberry, and iPhone app development. No developer should be without them! Touch Gesture Reference Guide (PDF) A valuable resource for desig

jQuery is a great JavaScript framework. However, as with any library, sometimes it’s necessary to get under the hood to discover what’s going on. Perhaps it’s because you’re tracing a bug or are just curious about how jQuery achieves a particular UI

10 fun jQuery game plugins to make your website more attractive and enhance user stickiness! While Flash is still the best software for developing casual web games, jQuery can also create surprising effects, and while not comparable to pure action Flash games, in some cases you can also have unexpected fun in your browser. jQuery tic toe game The "Hello world" of game programming now has a jQuery version. Source code jQuery Crazy Word Composition Game This is a fill-in-the-blank game, and it can produce some weird results due to not knowing the context of the word. Source code jQuery mine sweeping game

Article discusses creating, publishing, and maintaining JavaScript libraries, focusing on planning, development, testing, documentation, and promotion strategies.

This tutorial demonstrates how to create a captivating parallax background effect using jQuery. We'll build a header banner with layered images that create a stunning visual depth. The updated plugin works with jQuery 1.6.4 and later. Download the


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
