Home >Backend Development >C++ >Do I Need to Dispose of Fire-and-Forget TPL Tasks?
Not Disposing TPL Tasks: Consequences and Alternate Solutions
When triggering a task to run in the background without waiting for its completion, the common use of Task.Factory.StartNew() raises questions about the necessity of calling Dispose() on the returned Task object. While MSDN recommends disposing of all tasks, the issue of disposing tasks in this specific scenario is often overlooked.
Regarding the consequences of not disposing, Stephen Toub, a Microsoft PFX team member, clarifies that Task.Dispose() exists to handle an event handle used in certain waiting scenarios. However, when continuations are the primary means of accessing the task, this event handle will never be allocated. Stephen Toub suggests relying on finalization to manage these tasks.
Official documentation on this topic is limited. However, Stephen Toub's blog post, "Do I need to dispose of Tasks?," expands on this issue and highlights improvements introduced in .Net 4.5.
In general, you don't need to dispose of Task objects most of the time. Reasons to dispose include freeing unmanaged resources promptly and avoiding the finalizer cost. However, these considerations do not typically apply to Task objects:
Alternate methods for fire-and-forget tasks with TPL:
If disposing of task objects is still a concern, there are alternative approaches:
The above is the detailed content of Do I Need to Dispose of Fire-and-Forget TPL Tasks?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!