Home >Backend Development >C++ >Return Task or Await at the End of Async Methods: Which Approach Is Best?
Return vs. Await at the End of Async Methods: A Comprehensive Analysis
At the conclusion of an asynchronous method that returns a Task, developers face a dilemma: should they return the task or employ the await operator? To make informed decisions, let's explore the consequences of each approach.
Returning a Task
When returning a Task directly, the method makes itself responsible for the continuation of the asynchronous operation. If the method is not marked as async, this approach is valid. However, exceptions thrown within the synchronous portion of the method will be delivered synchronously, potentially disrupting the natural asynchronous flow.
This option is often preferred for methods that:
Example:
Task FooAsync() { return BazAsync(); // Option A }
Awaiting the Task
In contrast, awaiting the task within an async method delegates the continuation of the asynchronous operation to the caller. This approach ensures that all exceptions are handled asynchronously, preserving the intended flow of control.
Example:
async Task BarAsync() { await BazAsync(); // Option B }
Considerations
In conclusion, the appropriate approach depends on the specific requirements of the method and the intended behavior of the asynchronous operation. Weigh the consequences outlined above to make the best decision for your code.
The above is the detailed content of Return Task or Await at the End of Async Methods: Which Approach Is Best?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!