Window.close() Fails in Chrome: A Security Measure
In the realm of web development, it has been observed that invoking window.close() or self.close() in JavaScript has ceased to close the targeted window in the Chrome browser. This behavior stems from a crucial security measure implemented by Chrome to prevent malicious code and unsolicited pop-ups from compromising users' browsing experience.
The closure of windows is restricted primarily to scripts that have generated these windows. Chrome adheres closely to this principle, disallowing arbitrary closures by external scripts. However, a notable exception to this rule is available only to author-generated JavaScript, enabling the closure of windows created by the same script.
Firefox's Stricter Implementation
Firefox, on the other hand, enforces a stricter policy, prohibiting window closures unless the invoking script explicitly created the window utilizing the window.open() method. Any attempts to bypass this restriction result in error messages in Firefox, while Chrome opts for a silent failure.
Mitigations for Chrome Users
To address this challenge in Chrome, the "self redirection" exploit was previously exploited. However, this technique has been rendered largely ineffective in current versions of the browser. Nevertheless, a modified version of the strategy remains viable for use within a constrained set of circumstances. By employing Tampermonkey with explicit @grant authorization, window.close() can still be leveraged to close additional tabs (if present) in Chrome.
For Firefox users, the only viable solution involves disabling the built-in security settings within the browser. However, this practice is strongly discouraged due to the heightened security risks associated with weakened browser configurations.
Long-Term Solution and Enhancements
The most effective approach to circumvent this limitation permanently is to develop a Chrome extension or Firefox add-on. These mechanisms provide reliable window closure capabilities. Additionally, suggesting such functionality as a feature request to the maintainers of Greasemonkey and Tampermonkey could result in further improvements and simplified implementation for userscript authors.
The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn't `window.close()` Work in Chrome, and How Can I Fix It?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
