Let's start with the description for this problem:
Given an array nums containing n distinct numbers in the range [0, n], return the only number in the range that is missing from the array.
For example:
Input: nums = [3, 0, 1] Output: 2 Explanation: n = 3 since there are 3 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0, 3]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Or:
Input: nums = [0, 1] Output: 2 Explanation: n = 2 since there are 2 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0, 2]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Or:
Input: nums = [9, 6, 4, 2, 3, 5, 7, 0, 1] Output: 8 Explanation: n = 9 since there are 9 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0, 9]. 8 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
It's also stated that all the numbers of nums are unique.
One easy way to solve this is to get the total sum of the range, then subtract the sum of the given array. What is left will be the missing number.
It can be done using reduce to sum the numbers, like this:
function missingNumber(nums: number[]): number { return Array.from({ length: nums.length + 1 }, (_, idx) => idx).reduce((acc, item) => acc + item, 0) - nums.reduce((acc, item) => acc + item, 0); }
First, we create an array with values from 0 to nums.length 1 and get its sum, then subtract the sum of nums from it.
However, the time and space complexities will be O(n) with this solution as we create an array for the range.
We can have a more (storage-wise) efficient solution using bit manipulation.
In fact, we can use an XOR operation to help us with that.
To remember, XOR results in 1 if both of the bits are different — that is, one of them is 0 and the other is 1.
When we XOR a number with itself, it will result in 0, as all the bits are the same.
For example, 3 in binary is 11, when we do 11 ^ 11 the result is 0:
const n = 3; const result = n ^ n; // 0
In other words, an XOR operation of a number with itself will result in 0.
If we do XOR with each number in the array with the indices, eventually all of them will cancel out (result in 0), leaving only the missing number.
You might think that not all numbers are at their index, for example if nums is [3, 0, 1], it is obvious that 3 does not even have an "index 3" that can be associated with it!
For that, we can start by initializing our result to nums.length. Now, even if the missing number is equal to nums.length, we are handling that edge case.
let result = nums.length;
Also, XOR is commutative and associative, so it's not important at which index a number appears (or doesn't have one, like in the example above) — they eventually will cancel out.
Now, with a for loop, we can do the XOR using the bitwise XOR assignment operator:
for (let i = 0; i <p>And, the final result is the missing number. The solution overall looks like this:<br> </p><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">Input: nums = [3, 0, 1] Output: 2 Explanation: n = 3 since there are 3 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0, 3]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Time and space complexity
The time complexity is again O(n) as we iterate through each number in the array, but the space complexity will be O(1) as we don't have any additional storage need that will grow as the input size increases.
Next up, we will take a look at the final problem of the entire series, Sum of Two Integers. Until then, happy coding.
The above is the detailed content of LeetCode Meditations: Missing Number. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
