This is the third in a little trio of articles where I’m showing how quickly and easily you can implement common web features without relying on heavy libraries or complicated frameworks. This time, I worked on a "read more" button for clipped content - with maximal automation.
Feel Free to Use the Code
The code is straightforward, just vanilla JavaScript—no libraries, no magic. It's super lightweight and easy to integrate. It uses IntersectionObserver so it doesn't even run on elements until they're visible, saving performance overhead (though you may want to remove this optimization for smaller webpages).
https://gist.github.com/TomJPro/39e96d2cd6cbfcf908ad99273b2211a5
Discover a Whole New World of Simplicity
I assumed libraries existed for this because the problem seemed complex. But when I tried writing it myself, my head was stuck in the idea that it needed a complicated solution—my mind lied to me! Now I’m convinced these libraries exist because other developers also overthink the problem or try to solve every possible scenario with one huge solution. That can never truly work in a world where we count milliseconds.
When I wrote my first simple piece of code that did the job, it was just 20 lines compared to 100kb of a library, and it was even easier to customize for each project. It honestly felt like discovering a new world.
Want to See How I Built It?
I'm having fun with live streams. Come chat with me next time!
Watch the Live Stream
Final Thoughts
After seeing three common features (like a carousel, line clipping with a "read more", and similar scripts) coded in just a few minutes (including JS, HTML, and CSS), I hope it's clear that you often don't need heavy libraries. Sometimes, plain old JavaScript and a dash of CSS is all it takes to achieve slick, performant results.
The above is the detailed content of #ustom Code Instead of Plugins/Libraries - Showcase of Simplicity. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
