Home >Backend Development >C++ >Is Using 'dynamic' in C# Considered Bad Practice?
Is the Use of "dynamic" Considered Bad Practice?
Introduction:
Dynamic invocation in C# allows late type checking, leaving error discovery to runtime rather than compile time. While it can seem convenient, is it considered a proper practice?
Arguments Against "dynamic":
Alternatives to "dynamic":
Performance Considerations:
Benchmarking the performance of various invocation methods shows that "dynamic" performs worse than alternative approaches like interface virtual calls, extension methods, and generics.
In the Given Case:
For the case provided, it seems that using the common inheritance scheme (Interface with virtual method implementation) would suffice, eliminating the need for "dynamic."
Conclusion:
While "dynamic" can be useful in specific scenarios involving interoperability or reflection, it is generally considered a bad practice for day-to-day development due to its potential for error propagation and maintenance challenges. By using alternative methods for late binding, developers can maintain type-checking, improve code robustness, and enhance the maintainability of their codebase.
The above is the detailed content of Is Using 'dynamic' in C# Considered Bad Practice?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!