


How to Find the Script Element That Loaded the Currently Executing JavaScript?
How to Reference the Script Element That Loaded the Currently Executing Script
Understanding the Issue
In certain scenarios, developers may need to dynamically load additional scripts into the document. However, the conventional method of using document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(v) may not be suitable if the HEAD element has yet to be fully rendered.
Solution: Referencing the Current Script
To reference the script element that loaded the currently executing script, several techniques can be employed:
1. document.currentScript
Advantages:
- Simple, explicit, and reliable
- Doesn't require modifying the script tag
- Works with asynchronous scripts (defer & async)
- Works with scripts inserted dynamically
Limitations:
- Not supported in older browsers or IE
- Doesn't work with modules (
<br><script><br>var me = document.currentScript;<br></script><br>
2. Script Tag ID
Advantages:
- Simple, explicit, and reliable
- Widely supported
- Works with asynchronous scripts (defer & async)
- Works with scripts inserted dynamically
Limitations:
- Requires adding an id attribute to the script tag
<br><script>var me = document.getElementById('myscript');<br></script><br>
3. Data Attribute Selection
Advantages:
- Simple and explicit
- Works with asynchronous scripts (defer & async)
- Works with scripts inserted dynamically
Limitations:
- Requires adding a custom data-* attribute to the script tag
- Less widely supported than using ID
- May cause confusion with other elements sharing the same data attribute
<br><script data-name="myscript"><br>var me = document.querySelector('script[data-name="myscript"]');<br></script><br>
4. Source Selection
Advantages:
- Reliable
- Works with asynchronous scripts (defer & async)
- Works with scripts inserted dynamically
- No custom attributes or ID required
Limitations:
- Does not work for local scripts
- Causes problems in different environments (e.g., dev vs. prod)
- Static and fragile (changes to script location require modification)
- Less widely supported than using ID
- Problems arise if the same script is loaded multiple times
<br><script src="//example.com/embed.js"></script><br>
<br><script><br>var me = document.querySelector('script[src="//example.com/embed.js"]');<br></script><br>
5. Script Iteration
Advantages:
- Inherits benefits of previous techniques
- Doesn't rely on querySelector(), so it works in older browsers
Limitations:
- More complex and computationally expensive
<br><script><br>var me = null;<br>var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName("script")<br>for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; i) {<br> if (isMe(scripts[i])) {<pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">me = scripts[i];</script>
}
}
6. Last Executed Script
Advantages:
- Simple
- Nearly universally supported
- No custom attributes or ID required
Limitations:
- Does not work with asynchronous scripts (defer & async)
- Does not work with scripts inserted dynamically
<br><script><br>var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName( 'script' );<br>var me = scripts[ scripts.length - 1 ];<br></script><br>
Conclusion
The choice of method to reference the current script element depends on the specific requirements of the application and support for various browsers. For modern browsers, document.currentScript is the preferred approach.
The above is the detailed content of How to Find the Script Element That Loaded the Currently Executing JavaScript?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
