Home >Backend Development >C++ >How Can Task Sequencing Be Maintained with Re-Entrancy in Asynchronous Operations?

How Can Task Sequencing Be Maintained with Re-Entrancy in Asynchronous Operations?

Susan Sarandon
Susan SarandonOriginal
2024-12-28 17:02:15887browse

How Can Task Sequencing Be Maintained with Re-Entrancy in Asynchronous Operations?

Task Sequencing and Re-Entrancy

In scenarios where tasks can arrive faster than they are processed and may depend on prior results, sequencing tasks becomes crucial. This challenge is compounded when re-entrancy is required.

Problem Statement

A UI command handler may process commands synchronously or asynchronously. Commands can arrive at a rate that exceeds the processing speed, necessitating queueing and sequential processing. Each new task's result may depend on its predecessor. While cancellation is excluded for simplicity, re-entrancy must be supported.

Initial Approach

In a basic console app, an AsyncOp class manages task sequencing. Each task is treated as a continuation of the previous one, ensuring dependencies are met. However, when re-entrancy is introduced, the logic breaks down.

Synchronized Solution

To address this issue, tasks are constructed manually without scheduling them initially. Instead, "Task.Factory.StartNew" is used to run the tasks synchronously, preventing them from executing until the wrapper task is ready. This ensures that the sequence is maintained.

Code Implementation

class AsyncOp<T>
{
    Task<T> _pending = Task.FromResult(default(T));

    public Task<T> CurrentTask => _pending;

    public Task<T> RunAsync(Func<Task<T>> handler, bool useSynchronizationContext = false)
    {
        var pending = _pending;
        var wrapper = async () =>
        {
            var prevResult = await pending;
            Console.WriteLine($"\nprev task result:  {prevResult}");
            return await handler();
        };

        var task = new Task<Task<T>>(wrapper);
        var inner = task.Unwrap();
        _pending = inner;

        task.RunSynchronously(useSynchronizationContext ?
            TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext() :
            TaskScheduler.Current);

        return inner;
    }
}

Updated Output

Test #1...

prev task result:  0
this task arg: 1000

prev task result:  1000
this task arg: 900

prev task result:  900
this task arg: 800

Press any key to continue to test #2...


prev task result:  800
this task arg: 100

prev task result:  100
this task arg: 200

Extensions

This approach enables additional improvements such as thread-safety by implementing a lock to protect shared state. Additionally, a cancel/restart logic can be incorporated to handle task disruptions.

The above is the detailed content of How Can Task Sequencing Be Maintained with Re-Entrancy in Asynchronous Operations?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn