Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Use the PIMPL Idiom Instead of Directly Implementing Methods in the Public Class?
PIMPL Idiom: Benefits of Hiding Implementation
The PIMPL (Pointer to Implementation) idiom is a powerful technique for concealing implementation details in C . However, a question arises: why not directly implement methods on the public class rather than the private implementation class?
In the provided code example, the Purr method is defined in the CatImpl class, which is then wrapped by the public Cat class. This approach follows the "Handle Body" idiom, where the public interface serves as a pointer to the actual implementation.
By separating the interface from the implementation, several benefits emerge:
In commercial software products, this idiom is particularly valuable. It allows libraries to be shipped with a public API, while keeping the implementation confidential. Users can access the library's functionality without having to know its inner workings.
Furthermore, PIMPL facilitates design by contract, a methodology where the interface and implementation adhere to a specification. By keeping the implementation hidden, the focus is shifted to the adherence to the specification rather than the specific implementation.
In summary, the PIMPL idiom offers significant advantages by providing information hiding, flexibility, modular development, and support for design by contract. By leveraging this technique, developers can create stable, maintainable, and extensible software architectures.
The above is the detailed content of Why Use the PIMPL Idiom Instead of Directly Implementing Methods in the Public Class?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!