Home >Backend Development >C++ >Does (4 > y > 1) Always Evaluate to False in C ?
y > 1) Always Evaluate to False in C ? " />
Evaluating the Validity of (4 > y > 1) in C
In C , the expression (4 > y > 1) may raise questions about its validity and evaluation.
To understand its behavior, it's essential to know that chained comparison operators, such as (4 > y > 1), are parsed as nested comparisons from left to right. Therefore, the statement:
(4 > y > 1)
is parsed as:
((4 > y) > 1)
The comparison operators (> and <) evaluate in the order of the expression, which means that the result of (4 > y) is either 0 (false) or 1 (true) depending on the comparison.
Then, the result of (4 > y) is compared to 1 using the greater-than operator (>). However, since the result of (4 > y) is always either 0 or 1, it will never be greater than 1. Therefore, the entire statement always returns false.
Exception for Operator Overloading:
However, there is an exception to this behavior. If y is an object of a class with an overloaded greater-than operator (>), the evaluation may change. In such cases, the overloaded operator's implementation dictates the behavior of the expression.
Example:
Consider the following code:
class mytype { }; mytype operator>(int x, const mytype &y) { return mytype(); } int main() { mytype y; cout << (4 > y > 1) << endl; return 0; }
In this example, the custom operator operator> for the mytype class is used, which may result in different behavior according to the class implementation.
The above is the detailed content of Does (4 > y > 1) Always Evaluate to False in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!