Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Can't I Create a `std::vector` of References in C ?
In C , vectors are powerful containers that can store collections of elements. When attempting to create a vector that holds references to elements, you may encounter obstacles. This article explores the reason behind these restrictions and examines your options for storing references in containers.
The Issue with Vector of References
As you discovered, creating a vector of references (e.g., std::vector
Assignability and Containers
Vector and other containers require that their component types be assignable. Assignability means the ability to assign a new value to an object. However, references cannot be assigned; you can only initialize them to point to an object without altering them later.
This inherent property of references makes them unsuitable for use as components in containers, where elements can be dynamically added, removed, or modified. Without assignability, the container cannot maintain the integrity of its internal state.
Alternative Solutions
Although vectors cannot directly store references, there are alternative options for managing references in collections:
Conclusion
Understanding the Assignability Criteria for containers is crucial for effective C programming. While vectors cannot store references directly, alternative solutions using pointers or smart pointers enable flexible management of references in collections.
The above is the detailed content of Why Can't I Create a `std::vector` of References in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!