


AJAX Long/Short Polling vs. HTML5 WebSockets: Which to Choose?
For real-time applications, it's crucial to receive information promptly without resorting to page refreshes. AJAX has been the traditional approach, but its frequent server hits are less desirable. Hence, long/short polling was introduced. However, the advent of HTML5 WebSockets has sparked a debate: which is superior for different scenarios?
WebSockets: The Future Standard
HTML5 WebSockets has emerged as the preferred solution, offering significant advantages over long/short polling:
- Persistent Connection: Unlike AJAX, WebSockets establishes a persistent connection between client and server, enabling bi-directional data exchange.
- Real-Time Communication: WebSockets provides near-realtime communication, ideal for applications like instant messaging and data streaming.
- Reduced Server Load: Persistent connections reduce the frequency of server requests, alleviating server load.
- Improved Latency: WebSockets optimizes data transfer, minimizing latency and enhancing responsiveness.
AJAX Long/Short Polling: Obsolescence or Still Relevant?
Long/short polling has fallen out of popularity due to the advent of WebSockets. However, it may still have specific use cases:
- Limited Browser Support: WebSockets require support from the client browser, which may not be available in all environments.
- Security Concerns: AJAX uses HTTP requests and responses, which can raise security issues with vulnerable clients.
Comparison of Communication Techniques
For a comprehensive understanding, here's a comparison of AJAX, long/short polling, WebSockets, WebRTC, and Server-Sent Events:
- AJAX: One-time request-response communication using HTTP.
- Long Polling: Extended HTTP request with a persistent connection, periodically checked for responses.
- WebSockets: Persistent bi-directional communication over TCP with message framing and encryption.
- WebRTC: Peer-to-peer communication for streaming and real-time applications.
- Server-Sent Events: Unidirectional data transfer from server to client over a persistent connection.
Advantages of WebSockets
Server-side, WebSockets offer compelling advantages:
- Enhanced Performance: Shared memory between socket connections enables efficient data handling.
- Architecture Optimization: Eliminates the need for databases as intermediaries.
Security Considerations
WebSockets offer robust security measures:
- Encryption: Supports both HTTP and HTTPS protocols for secure data transfer.
- Frame Masking: Encrypts data sent from client to server, reducing the risk of eavesdropping.
In conclusion, HTML5 WebSockets have largely superseded AJAX long/short polling as the preferred technology for real-time communication. Their superior performance, persistent connections, and enhanced security make them the optimal choice for applications that demand timely and efficient data exchange.
The above is the detailed content of AJAX Long/Short Polling vs. WebSockets: Which Real-Time Communication Technology Should You Choose?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.

JavaScript originated in 1995 and was created by Brandon Ike, and realized the language into C. 1.C language provides high performance and system-level programming capabilities for JavaScript. 2. JavaScript's memory management and performance optimization rely on C language. 3. The cross-platform feature of C language helps JavaScript run efficiently on different operating systems.

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
