Is cplusplus.com a Reliable Source for Accurate C Information?

Question:

Are there any known inaccuracies, misconceptions, or potentially misleading advice provided by cplusplus.com?

Answer:

Inaccuracies Regarding std::remove and list::remove:

One notable inaccuracy concerns the behavior of the std::remove function. cplusplus.com incorrectly states that std::remove does not alter elements beyond the new end of the container, claiming that they maintain their old values and remain accessible. However, this is not the case. The iterator in the range [new_end, old_end) may remain dereferenceable, but the content it points to is unspecified and should not be relied upon.

Moreover, cplusplus.com erroneously asserts that list::remove behaves similarly to std::remove. However, list::remove, unlike std::remove, actually removes elements from the container.

Risks of Using cplusplus.com:

Using cplusplus.com to make coding decisions poses the risk of relying on incorrect or misleading information. This could lead to incorrect code behavior, erroneous assumptions about the functionality of library elements, and potential debugging challenges.

Alternative Sources for Accurate C Documentation:

To ensure the accuracy of your code and avoid potential issues, consider using reliable references for C documentation such as the ISO standard, cppreference, or MSDN.

The above is the detailed content of Is cplusplus.com a Reliable Source for Accurate C Information?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!