The description for this problem is:
Given a string s and a dictionary of strings wordDict, return true if s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words.
Note that the same word in the dictionary may be reused multiple times in the segmentation.
For example:
Input: s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet", "code"] Output: true Explanation: Return true because "leetcode" can be segmented as "leet code".
Or:
Input: s = "applepenapple", wordDict = ["apple", "pen"] Output: true Explanation: Return true because "applepenapple" can be segmented as "apple pen apple". Note that you are allowed to reuse a dictionary word.
Or:
Input: s = "catsandog", wordDict = ["cats", "dog", "sand", "and", "cat"] Output: false
Also, our constraints indicate that all the strings of wordDict are **unique**, and:
- 1
- 1
- 1
- s and wordDict[i] consist of only lowercase English letters.
Continuing with dynamic programming solutions, we can look at a popular bottom-up approach where we build a dp array to track whether it is possible to break s into words in wordDict at each index.
Each index i in the dp array will indicate whether it is possible to break the entire string into words starting at index i .
Note |
---|
dp needs to be of size s.length 1 to hold the edge case of an empty string, in other words, when we're out of bounds. |
Let's create it with initially false values:
Input: s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet", "code"] Output: true Explanation: Return true because "leetcode" can be segmented as "leet code".
The last index is the empty string, which can be considered breakable, or in other words, valid:
Input: s = "applepenapple", wordDict = ["apple", "pen"] Output: true Explanation: Return true because "applepenapple" can be segmented as "apple pen apple". Note that you are allowed to reuse a dictionary word.
Going backwards, for each index of s, we can check if any word in wordDict can be reached from that index onwards:
Input: s = "catsandog", wordDict = ["cats", "dog", "sand", "and", "cat"] Output: false
If we're still within bounds of s (i word.length
let dp = Array.from({ length: s.length + 1 }, () => false); // +1 for the base case, out of bounds
If we can break it into any word in wordDict, we don't have to keep looking at other words, so we can just break out of the loop:
dp[s.length] = true; // base case
Finally, we return dp[0] — if the whole string is breakable into words in wordDict, its value will store true, otherwise false:
for (let i = s.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { for (const word of wordDict) { /* ... */ } }
And, here is the final solution:
for (let i = s.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { for (const word of wordDict) { if (i + word.length <h4> Time and space complexity </h4> <p>The time complexity is <span><span><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>∗</mo><mi>m</mi><mo>∗</mo><mi>t</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow>O(n * m * t) </semantics></math><span><span>O(n∗</span><span>m∗</span><span>t)</span></span></span> </span> where <span><span><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow>n </semantics></math><span><span>n</span></span></span> </span> is the string s, <span><span><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow>m </semantics></math><span><span>m</span></span></span> </span> is the number of words in wordDict, and <span><span><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow>t </semantics></math><span><span>t</span></span></span> </span> is the maximum length word in wordDict — as we have a nested loop that runs through each word in wordDict with a slice operation that uses word.length for each character in s.</p> <p>The space complexity is <span><span><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>n</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow>O(n) </semantics></math><span><span>O(n)</span></span></span> </span> because of the dp array we store for each index of s.</p> <hr> <p>The last dynamic programming problem in the series will be Longest Increasing Subsequence. Until then, happy coding.</p>
The above is the detailed content of LeetCode Meditations: Word Break. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment