search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Can We Safely Move Elements from a `std::initializer_list` in C ?

Can We Safely Move Elements from a `std::initializer_list` in C  ?

Moving Elements from std::initializer_list

In C , an initializer list, denoted as std::initializer_list, poses a question regarding the movement of its elements. Can we safely extract and move elements from such a list? Let's investigate the issue.

In the code snippet below, a function foo accepts an initializer list as an argument:

#include <initializer_list>
#include <utility>

template<typename t>
void foo(std::initializer_list<t> list)
{
    for (auto it = list.begin(); it != list.end(); ++it)
    {
        bar(std::move(*it)); // Intended to move the element
    }
}</t></typename></utility></initializer_list>

The concern arises because std::initializer_list exhibits unique characteristics that distinguish it from ordinary containers. Its elements reside in a temporary buffer and are not subject to the same value semantics as standard containers. This raises doubts about the potential for successful movement.

Unfortunately, the expectation of seamless element movement is unfounded. An attempt to move elements from an initializer list will yield unexpected results. Instead of relocating the elements, copies are created. This behavior stems from the fact that the begin and end functions in std::initializer_list return const T *, which results in an immutable rvalue reference denoted as T const &&.

Consequently, the move expression employed in bar(std::move(*it)) binds to a function parameter of type T const &, effectively preserving the copies.

The reason for this limitation is attributed to the compiler's prerogative to instantiate std::initializer_list as a statically initialized constant. Allowing mutable results from begin and end would hinder this optimization, introducing complexity in the compiler's design.

Despite the unexpected behavior, a solution may lie on the horizon. An [ISO proposal](https://github.com/CaseyCarter/iso-changes/blob/master/icpp/p1716r4.md) seeks to introduce initializer list support for move-only types. This effort aims to enhance the language's capabilities and provide a more consistent approach to working with initializer lists and move semantics.

The above is the detailed content of Can We Safely Move Elements from a `std::initializer_list` in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

Beyond the Hype: Assessing the Relevance of C   TodayBeyond the Hype: Assessing the Relevance of C TodayApr 14, 2025 am 12:01 AM

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

The C   Community: Resources, Support, and DevelopmentThe C Community: Resources, Support, and DevelopmentApr 13, 2025 am 12:01 AM

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C# vs. C  : Where Each Language ExcelsC# vs. C : Where Each Language ExcelsApr 12, 2025 am 12:08 AM

C# is suitable for projects that require high development efficiency and cross-platform support, while C is suitable for applications that require high performance and underlying control. 1) C# simplifies development, provides garbage collection and rich class libraries, suitable for enterprise-level applications. 2)C allows direct memory operation, suitable for game development and high-performance computing.

The Continued Use of C  : Reasons for Its EnduranceThe Continued Use of C : Reasons for Its EnduranceApr 11, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C Reasons for continuous use include its high performance, wide application and evolving characteristics. 1) High-efficiency performance: C performs excellently in system programming and high-performance computing by directly manipulating memory and hardware. 2) Widely used: shine in the fields of game development, embedded systems, etc. 3) Continuous evolution: Since its release in 1983, C has continued to add new features to maintain its competitiveness.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
R.E.P.O. Best Graphic Settings
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Will R.E.P.O. Have Crossplay?
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool