Home >Java >javaTutorial >When Should I Use '.equals()' Instead of '==' in Java?
Understanding the Differences Between ".equals" and "=="
Your lecturer's insistence on using ".equals" instead of "==" for object comparison raises the question of their relative merits.
What's the Difference?
In Java, "==" compares object references, determining if two objects occupy the same memory location. It works well for primitive types (e.g., int, double) that store values directly in memory.
However, for non-primitive types (e.g., String, Object), "==" compares object references rather than the actual values stored within them. This can lead to incorrect or incomplete equality checks.
".equals," on the other hand, is a method redefined for custom classes to determine value-based equality. It can be overridden to specify custom logic for comparing objects.
Why is ".equals" Better?
Your lecturer prefers ".equals" because it:
Example: Comparing String Objects
Consider the following code:
String x = "hello"; String y = new String(new char[] { 'h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o' });
"==" would evaluate to false because x and y are distinct objects despite containing the same string value. However, ".equals" would return true because it compares the values of the String objects.
Conclusion
While "==" is faster than ".equals" for primitive types, it should be avoided for non-primitive types in favor of ".equals." ".equals" provides more reliable and flexible value-based equality checks, ensuring that your code operates correctly regardless of object references or custom object definitions.
The above is the detailed content of When Should I Use '.equals()' Instead of '==' in Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!