


Unmarshaling into an Interface{} and Performing Type Assertion
Unmarshaling JSON into an interface{} allows for handling a diverse range of data types. However, directly asserting the type of the unmarshaled interface{} poses challenges.
In the given scenario, the interface{} is unmarshaled from a received message. Attempting to perform a type switch on this interface{} as seen in the code snippet produces unexpected results, with the type being declared as map[string]interface{}.
To resolve this issue, it's important to understand the default types that the JSON package unmarshals into, as listed in its documentation:
- bool
- float64
- string
- []interface{}
- map[string]interface{}
- nil
Since the unmarshaling is performed into an interface{}, the resulting type will be limited to this set. Therefore, the package is unaware of custom structs like Something1 and Something2.
Solution Options:
1. Direct Unmarshaling:
To avoid intermediate interface{} handling, JSON data can be directly unmarshaled into the desired struct type. For instance:
var job Something1 json.Unmarshal([]byte(msg), &job)
2. Convert from Generic Interface:
If working with a generic interface{} is necessary, the data can be manually unpacked from the map[string]interface{}. Here's an example:
var input interface{} json.Unmarshal([]byte(msg), &input) if smth1, ok := input.(map[string]interface{}); ok { job := Something1{ Thing: smth1["thing"].(string), OtherThing: smth1["other_thing"].(int64), } }
3. Wrapper Struct:
For cases where handling various data types is common, a wrapper struct with a custom UnmarshalJSON method can simplify the process. This method can attempt to unmarshal the data into different structs and set the Data field accordingly.
The above is the detailed content of How to Safely Unmarshal JSON into an Interface{} and Handle Type Assertion?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang excels in practical applications and is known for its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) Concurrent programming is implemented through Goroutines and Channels, 2) Flexible code is written using interfaces and polymorphisms, 3) Simplify network programming with net/http packages, 4) Build efficient concurrent crawlers, 5) Debugging and optimizing through tools and best practices.

The core features of Go include garbage collection, static linking and concurrency support. 1. The concurrency model of Go language realizes efficient concurrent programming through goroutine and channel. 2. Interfaces and polymorphisms are implemented through interface methods, so that different types can be processed in a unified manner. 3. The basic usage demonstrates the efficiency of function definition and call. 4. In advanced usage, slices provide powerful functions of dynamic resizing. 5. Common errors such as race conditions can be detected and resolved through getest-race. 6. Performance optimization Reuse objects through sync.Pool to reduce garbage collection pressure.

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Confused about the sorting of SQL query results. In the process of learning SQL, you often encounter some confusing problems. Recently, the author is reading "MICK-SQL Basics"...

The relationship between technology stack convergence and technology selection In software development, the selection and management of technology stacks are a very critical issue. Recently, some readers have proposed...

Golang ...

How to compare and handle three structures in Go language. In Go programming, it is sometimes necessary to compare the differences between two structures and apply these differences to the...


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.