Home >Backend Development >C++ >How Can `vector v(istream_iterator(cin), istream_iterator());` Be Interpreted as a Function Declaration in C ?

How Can `vector v(istream_iterator(cin), istream_iterator());` Be Interpreted as a Function Declaration in C ?

Susan Sarandon
Susan SarandonOriginal
2024-12-16 12:13:10228browse

How Can `vector v(istream_iterator(cin), istream_iterator());` Be Interpreted as a Function Declaration in C  ?

The Most Vexing Parse: Clarifying a Confusing Detail

In programming, the "Most Vexing Parse" refers to a notorious ambiguity in C syntax that can lead to unexpected function declarations. This article aims to unravel one such confusing aspect of the Most Vexing Parse.

Consider the following line of code:

vector<int> v(istream_iterator<int>(cin), istream_iterator<int>());

How can this line be parsed as a function declaration?

Understanding the Syntax

Normally, the Most Vexing Parse problem arises when a second temporary object is interpreted as a function returning an iterator and taking no arguments. However, in this case, it is the first temporary object, istream_iterator(cin), that poses the dilemma.

The first temporary object, istream_iterator(cin), is identical to istream_iterator cin with superfluous parentheses. This syntax was borrowed from C and has been acknowledged as a mistake.

The Interpretation

The compiler interprets istream_iterator(cin) as a declaration of a parameter named cin, which is of type istream_iterator. The parentheses do not affect the meaning of the statement.

Therefore, the line of code is interpreted as a function declaration with one parameter, cin, which is of type istream_iterator. The function returns a vector of integers.

Arbitrary Parentheses in Argument Lists

The parentheses around cin in istream_iterator(cin) do not indicate that it is an argument to a function within parentheses. Instead, they simply enclose an expression that evaluates to a value of type istream_iterator.

Conclusion

The key to understanding this case is to recognize that the superfluous parentheses do not alter the meaning of the statement. The interpretation of istream_iterator(cin) as a parameter type, rather than a function call within parentheses, eliminates the confusion in this particular example of the Most Vexing Parse.

The above is the detailed content of How Can `vector v(istream_iterator(cin), istream_iterator());` Be Interpreted as a Function Declaration in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn