Home >Backend Development >C++ >How Does C 's Stricter Rules Differ from C's More Lenient Approach?
C 's Incompleteness: Where C Diverges from Its Subset
Despite frequent claims that C is wholly contained within C , subtle distinctions render this assertion incomplete. This article highlights instances where code acceptable in C becomes incompatible in C , shedding light on the differences that set them apart.
Intricate Definiteness
C enforces stricter rules for variable definitions, prohibiting tentativeness. Declaring the same variable repeatedly, as in int n; int n;, is impermissible in C , unlike in C.
Array Compatibility Disparity
C introduces type compatibility constraints that don't exist in C. In C, an array int a[1] can be assigned to a pointer int (*ap)[] = &a, despite being of different types (int[] vs. int[1]). This assignment would fail in C .
Obsolete Function Definitions
C abandons the K&R style of function definitions, rendering constructions like int b(a) int a; { } syntactically incorrect.
Nested Struct Scope Difference
Nested structs in C have class scope, unlike in C. Consequently, declaring a nested struct outside of an enclosing struct definition, such as struct B b;, results in an incomplete type error in C .
Explicit Type Specifiers Required
C mandates explicit type specifiers for all declarations. Omitting type information, as in auto a;, leads to syntax errors.
C99 Contributes Further Discrepancies
C99 introduces additional incompatibilities:
The above is the detailed content of How Does C 's Stricter Rules Differ from C's More Lenient Approach?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!