Returning a std::unique_ptr without std::move
In C , std::unique_ptr enforces move semantics to prevent multiple ownership of objects. However, it's possible to return a unique_ptr from a function without invoking std::move. This behavior can be attributed to a language feature called copy elision.
Copy Elision
According to the C language specification (12.8 §34 and §35), an implementation is permitted to elide (omit) copy/move operations when certain criteria are met. Specifically, copy elision is allowed in a return statement for a class return type, provided that the expression is the name of a non-volatile automatic object with the same cv-unqualified type as the function return type.
Elision in unique_ptr Return Statements
In the example code you provided:
unique_ptr<int> foo() { unique_ptr<int> p(new int(10)); return p; // Line 1 }</int></int>
p is a non-volatile automatic object that has the same type as the function return type, unique_ptr
When the compiler encounters line 1, it first performs overload resolution to select the constructor for the copy operation, as if p were designated by an rvalue. However, since the criteria for elision are met, the copy construction is elided and the returned value becomes a moved-out unique_ptr.
Implications for best practices
It's important to note that returning by value should be the default choice in this scenario. In the presence of copy elision, a named value in the return statement is treated as an rvalue. This means that even without explicitly using std::move, the returned unique_ptr can be moved from the function's temporary object.
Returning by reference or using std::make_unique are both viable alternatives to avoid copy elision and ensure explicit ownership transfer.
The above is the detailed content of Can I Return a `std::unique_ptr` Without `std::move` in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C is widely used in the fields of game development, embedded systems, financial transactions and scientific computing, due to its high performance and flexibility. 1) In game development, C is used for efficient graphics rendering and real-time computing. 2) In embedded systems, C's memory management and hardware control capabilities make it the first choice. 3) In the field of financial transactions, C's high performance meets the needs of real-time computing. 4) In scientific computing, C's efficient algorithm implementation and data processing capabilities are fully reflected.

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
