Home >Backend Development >C++ >To Override or Not to Override: Is Explicitly Declaring 'virtual' Necessary When Overriding Virtual Functions in C ?
Overriding Virtual Functions in Derived C Classes: Necessity or Not?
C provides the "virtual" keyword to enable polymorphic behavior in derived classes. Polymorphism allows different classes to implement different versions of the same function. However, there is a question that arises: is it necessary to specify "virtual" when overriding virtual functions in derived classes?
Consider the following struct definition:
struct A { virtual void hello() = 0; };
This defines an abstract base class A with a pure virtual function hello(). Now, let's examine two approaches to overriding this function in a derived class B:
Approach #1: struct B : public A { virtual void hello() { ... } };
Approach #2: struct B : public A { void hello() { ... } };
The question is: is there any difference between these two approaches?
Answer:
The answer is no, there is no difference in behavior between these two approaches. However, there is a subtle distinction in their usage.
In the example provided, the overridden function is already declared as virtual in the base class A. Therefore, both approaches will result in polymorphic behavior. The choice between the two approaches depends on the clarity and consistency you prefer in your code.
The above is the detailed content of To Override or Not to Override: Is Explicitly Declaring 'virtual' Necessary When Overriding Virtual Functions in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!