Home >Backend Development >C++ >`std::make_unique` vs. Manual `std::unique_ptr` Construction: When Should You Use Which?

`std::make_unique` vs. Manual `std::unique_ptr` Construction: When Should You Use Which?

Patricia Arquette
Patricia ArquetteOriginal
2024-12-14 06:40:12420browse

`std::make_unique` vs. Manual `std::unique_ptr` Construction: When Should You Use Which?

When to Use std::make_unique Over Manual Construction of std::unique_ptr

The std::make_unique function provides several benefits for constructing unique pointers compared to manually using the new operator and the unique_ptr constructor:

Safety for Creating Temporaries:

  • std::make_unique can be safely used to create temporary unique pointers, while explicit use of new requires caution to avoid using unnamed temporaries.

Simplified Syntax:

  • make_unique reduces the need for redundant type usage, making code more concise and avoiding the possibility of type mismatches.

Avoidance of Rules for Using new:

  • With make_unique, there is no need to remember the rule about "never" using new directly when creating unique pointers. Instead, make_unique can be used as a universal solution.

Potential Enhancements in C 17:

  • C 17 may include changes that remove the potential safety concerns associated with directly using new when constructing empty unique pointers. However, make_unique remains the recommended approach for safety and clarity.

In summary, std::make_unique provides benefits in terms of safety, syntax simplification, and adherence to best practices for unique pointer creation. Although it does not offer runtime efficiency advantages like std::make_shared, its use is encouraged for creating unique pointers in modern C code.

The above is the detailed content of `std::make_unique` vs. Manual `std::unique_ptr` Construction: When Should You Use Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn