Home >Backend Development >C++ >C 11 Concurrency: When Should I Use `atomic` Instead of `volatile`?
Concurrency: Atomicity and Volatility in C 11 Memory Model
In scenarios where multiple threads access shared resources concurrently, ensuring data integrity is crucial. C 11 introduced atomic and volatile keywords to handle such scenarios differently.
Volatile: A Hint, Not a Guarantee
Volatile signifies to the compiler that a variable can change asynchronously, prompting it to always read from and write to memory, avoiding potential optimizations that might lead to stale values. However, volatile does not guarantee atomic access, meaning multiple threads can still access it simultaneously, potentially causing inconsistencies.
Atomic: Enforcing Atomicity
In contrast, atomic types provide strong guarantees of atomicity. Operations on atomic variables are performed atomically, ensuring that only one thread can modify the variable at any given time. This prevents the possibility of stale value reads.
Behavior in a Multithreaded Scenario
In your example with a shared global variable accessed by multiple threads, volatile would allow each thread to potentially read outdated values from its own cache. Atomics, on the other hand, would enforce atomicity, ensuring that all threads read the most up-to-date value.
Advantages of Atomics over Volatile
Conclusion
In a multithreaded environment where shared variables need to be accessed concurrently, atomic types offer a superior choice to volatile. Their strong guarantees of atomicity ensure data integrity, simplify memory ordering, and potentially improve efficiency in performance-critical scenarios.
The above is the detailed content of C 11 Concurrency: When Should I Use `atomic` Instead of `volatile`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!