Home >Backend Development >Golang >Is Concurrent Iteration Over Go Maps with `range` Safe, and How Can It Be Achieved?
The concept of concurrent access to maps using the range keyword in Go is often misunderstood. To clarify this matter, let's explore the intricacies of accessing maps concurrently and the implications of using range.
The range expression in a for statement is evaluated only once before the loop begins, excluding certain specific scenarios. In the case of a map, the range expression simply points to the map variable.
During iteration with range, the key and value variables (k and v in most cases) hold the values from the map during each iteration. However, map access does not occur within the for block while executing an iteration. It happens when the k and v values are set for the next iteration.
Understanding these concepts, it is safe to perform concurrent iteration over a map by using a lock to protect the map during the iteration. However, unlocking within the iteration should be done as a deferred statement to handle early returns.
var testMap = make(map[int]int) var testMapLock = &sync.RWMutex{} func IterateMapKeys(iteratorChannel chan int) error { testMapLock.RLock() defer testMapLock.RUnlock() for k, v := range testMap { testMapLock.RUnlock() someFunc() testMapLock.RLock() if someCond { return someErr } } return nil }
It's crucial to note that this type of locking scheme only secures against concurrent access. It does not prevent concurrent modifications by other goroutines. However, if modifications are guarded with write locks, they remain safe, but the for loop won't necessarily iterate over the new pair.
Unlocking the read lock within the for block is unsafe, as it allows other goroutines to modify the map and potentially cause a race condition.
The above is the detailed content of Is Concurrent Iteration Over Go Maps with `range` Safe, and How Can It Be Achieved?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!