async/await: Promise Unveiled
Promises are a fundamental aspect of asynchronous programming in JavaScript. When it comes to async/await, it's important to demystify the notion that async functions always return a Promise.
The await keyword, placed before a Promise-returning function call, suspends the execution of the current function until the Promise is either resolved or rejected. However, this suspension does not unwrap the Promise. The result of the Promise is still encapsulated within the returned Promise object.
To illustrate, consider the following code that simulates an asynchronous request:
const getJSON = async () => { const request = () => new Promise((resolve, reject) => ( setTimeout(() => resolve({ foo: 'bar' }), 2000) )); const json = await request(); return json; };
When invoking getJSON(), it returns a Promise because the await statement merely suspends execution until the request completes:
console.log(getJSON()); // returns Promise
In contrast, when chaining .then(), the result of the Promise is finally exposed:
getJSON().then(json => console.log(json)); // prints { foo: 'bar' }
Why can't you bypass the Promise wrapping with console.log(getJSON())? This is a fundamental property of Promises. Promises represent asynchronous operations, and their outcomes are not known until they resolve or reject. External access to the result is intentionally prohibited, ensuring that the Promise remains the sole mediator of the result.
Remember, async/await makes working with Promises more convenient by suspending execution when Promises are encountered, but it does not remove the necessity of unwrapping Promises to access their results.
The above is the detailed content of Does async/await in JavaScript Always Return a Promise, and Why?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr

Node.js excels at efficient I/O, largely thanks to streams. Streams process data incrementally, avoiding memory overload—ideal for large files, network tasks, and real-time applications. Combining streams with TypeScript's type safety creates a powe

The differences in performance and efficiency between Python and JavaScript are mainly reflected in: 1) As an interpreted language, Python runs slowly but has high development efficiency and is suitable for rapid prototype development; 2) JavaScript is limited to single thread in the browser, but multi-threading and asynchronous I/O can be used to improve performance in Node.js, and both have advantages in actual projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.
