Why Does This Goroutine Code Produce Unexpected Results and How Can Data Races Be Avoided?

Data Race in Goroutine Behavior

The provided code snippet introduces a data race issue that can lead to unpredictable results. The core issue stems from the nature of Goroutines and the way the range variable is being passed to the Goroutine's function.

The Data Race

The provided code uses a range loop over the data slice, and for each iteration, it starts a new goroutine to print the name field of the field struct. However, within each iteration, the range variable v points to the same underlying data structure in the data slice, which is a reference.

As the loop progresses and variable v iterates through the data slice, its value changes to point to the next element. This means that by the time the goroutine's function is executed, it has the last value of v, which is the last element in the slice.

Therefore, the execution of the goroutines will result in printing the name field of only the last element, "three," three times instead of the intended "one," "two," "three" in any order.

Solutions

To fix this issue, several solutions are available:

1. Create a New Variable:

   • Introduce a new variable v within the loop iteration that is scoped only to that iteration. This ensures that each goroutine has its own unique version of v that points to the correct element in the slice.

2. Use a Slice of Pointers:

   • Modify the data slice to hold pointers to the field structs instead of direct references. This way, each iteration of the loop gets a pointer to a specific element, eliminating the problem of variable overwriting.

3. Use the Address of the Slice Element:

   • Explicitly take the address of the slice element during the range loop. This provides each goroutine with the correct address to the specific element in the slice.

Additional Approaches

• Pass Arguments to Anonymous Function: Use an anonymous function within the goroutine to pass range variables as arguments. This ensures that each goroutine has access to its own unique copy of the range variable.
• Pointer Receiver: The code uses a struct method (field.print()) with a pointer receiver. This implementation typically warrants the use of a slice of pointers for the data slice to avoid the issue.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does This Goroutine Code Produce Unexpected Results and How Can Data Races Be Avoided?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!