Home >Java >javaTutorial >Why Doesn't C Automatically Insert `break` Statements After `case` Statements in `switch` Statements?
The Necessity of Break Statements After Case Statements in C
The C switch statement evaluates a single expression and executes a specific code block based on a matching case label. Although the compiler does not automatically insert break statements after each case block, this design decision has deep-rooted reasons and offers practical flexibility.
Why No Automatic Break Statements?
Historically, this design choice stems from the limitations of the ARM processor architecture. In early versions of the ARM instruction set, break instructions carried a performance penalty. By leaving the insertion of break statements to the programmer, the compiler allowed for optimization and reduced instruction cycles in specific scenarios.
When Multiple Code Blocks Execute
Despite the absence of automatic break statements, there are legitimate use cases for allowing multiple code blocks to execute:
switch (ch) { case 'A': case 'B': case 'C': printf("Vowel\n"); break; default: printf("Consonant\n"); }
Here, if the input character is 'A', 'B', or 'C', the program should print "Vowel." By using a single code block for these cases, it can avoid code duplication and maintain clarity.
switch (ch) { case '1': case '2': case '3': printf("Low number\n"); break; case '4': printf("Medium number\n"); break; default: printf("High number\n"); }
Here, the first three cases handle low numbers, and thus they execute the same code block.
Although falling through is considered a programming anti-pattern in most cases, there are instances where it can prove beneficial, as long as the code is well-documented and its implications are thoroughly understood.
The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn't C Automatically Insert `break` Statements After `case` Statements in `switch` Statements?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!