Home >Backend Development >C++ >When Does `reinterpret_cast` Actually Create Objects?

When Does `reinterpret_cast` Actually Create Objects?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-12-09 19:41:11471browse

When Does `reinterpret_cast` Actually Create Objects?

Reinterpret_cast and Trivial Default Constructors: A Journey into Undefined Behavior

The cppreference documentation once claimed that trivial default-constructible objects could be created using reinterpret_cast on suitably aligned memory. However, this assertion has since been revised to emphasize the requirement of using placement-new to explicitly initialize such objects.

The Mystery of Lifetime

If reinterpret_cast did create objects, we would encounter a dilemma regarding their lifetime. Would the casting operation itself mark the object's inception? Or would it occur earlier, when the storage was allocated with an expression like alignas(X) char buffer[sizeof(X)]?

In the latter case, it raises the intriguing possibility that a conditional statement between storage allocation and casting could potentially construct either an X object or some other trivially default-constructible entity, Y.

The Clarifying Guidance of the Standard

Unfortunately, the C standard explicitly excludes such amorphous object creation. According to [intro.object]/1, objects can only come into being through a definition, a new-expression, the activation of a union's active member, or the creation of a temporary object.

Not Even a Vacuous Existence

The notion of a vacuous initialization lifetime is irrelevant to this situation. For that concept to apply, an object must first exist, which is not the case here.

Consistently Undefined

Throughout the history of C , the behavior of reinterpret_casting trivially default-constructible objects has remained consistently undefined. Both C 11 and C 1z adhere to the fundamental principle that distinct objects must have distinct addresses, rendering the creation of multiple objects within the same storage a Schrödinger's cat-like paradox.

Conclusion

The reinterpret_cast operation is not a magical tool for creating objects. In attempting to invoke its creative powers, programmers risk invoking undefined behavior and plunging their code into the treacherous depths of unpredictability.

The above is the detailed content of When Does `reinterpret_cast` Actually Create Objects?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn