Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Can't I Use Initializer Lists on the Right-Hand Side of C Operators?

Why Can't I Use Initializer Lists on the Right-Hand Side of C Operators?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-12-09 01:19:13702browse

Why Can't I Use Initializer Lists on the Right-Hand Side of C   Operators?

Operator Overloading and Initializer Lists on RHS

In C programming, initializer lists are a concise syntax to initialize aggregate objects with a list of expressions. While initializer lists can be conveniently employed in various scenarios, their usage on the right-hand side (RHS) of operators has been a point of discussion.

Why Initializer Lists Are Restricted on RHS

C 11 does not allow initializer lists on the RHS of operators, including the binary operator << used in your code. There are a few reasons for this restriction:

  • Initializer Lists Are Not Expressions: According to the C standard, initializer lists are not considered expressions. Binary operator arguments are typically expressions, and the grammar defined for expressions excludes initializer lists.
  • Parser Challenges: Allowing initializer lists on the left-hand side (LHS) of operators poses a grammatical challenge. The standard grammar for expressions could become ambiguous if it allowed initializer lists in both LHS and RHS positions.

Exceptions for Initializer Lists

Despite the general restriction on using initializer lists in operator arguments, C does define specific exceptions where initializer lists are accepted:

  • As arguments to functions
  • As subscripts in array access expressions
  • As arguments to constructors
  • In return statements
  • As the initializer in variable definitions

In your code, you can use an initializer list as an argument to the bar constructor, which is called within the << operator:

foo baz;
baz << bar{1, -2, "foo", 4, 5}; // Legal

Reasons for the Restriction

The decision to restrict initializer lists on the RHS of operators stems from the desire to maintain a consistent and clear grammar. Allowing initializer lists in all contexts would have introduced additional complexity and potential ambiguity in the language.

As noted in the discussion paper mentioned in your question, the alternative of allowing initializer lists on the RHS but not the LHS was considered too problematic. Therefore, the conservative approach of allowing initializer lists only in specific contexts was chosen.

The above is the detailed content of Why Can't I Use Initializer Lists on the Right-Hand Side of C Operators?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn