


While working on another article about converting various values into ReadableStream, I stumbled upon a neat trick to convert FormData into a multipart/form-data string and back using the Response. Surprisingly, FormData doesn't provide this functionality out of the box. However, by leveraging the methods of Response, we can achieve this quite easily.
I even tried to get assistance from ChatGPT (both 4o and o1-preview), but it couldn't suggest or synthesize this solution, even with hints. Google searches didn't yield any results either. It seems this approach is unknown or little-known, though I don't claim originality. I don't think the ability for such conversion was intentionally designed by the authors of the Response API; it's more of a side effect, which makes the solution even more interesting. So, I decided to write this article to share my findings.
Converting FormData to a Multipart/Form-Data String
Let's suppose we have an instance of FormData:
const formData = new FormData(); formData.set('value', 123); formData.set( 'myfile', new File(['{"hello":"world"}'], 'demo.json', { type: 'application/json' }) );
Our goal is to obtain a multipart/form-data string from this FormData instance. Common suggestions involve manually serializing FormData into a string or performing complex manipulations via Request, or using a library for it. However, we can simply use the Response constructor, which accepts FormData as the body, and then call its text() method to get the desired string representation:
// FormData -> multipart/form-data string function convertFormDataToMultipartString(formData) { return new Response(formData).text(); } const multipartString = await convertFormDataToMultipartString(formData); console.log(multipartString); // Example output: // ------WebKitFormBoundaryQi7NBNu0nAmyAhpU // Content-Disposition: form-data; name="value" // // 123 // ------WebKitFormBoundaryQi7NBNu0nAmyAhpU // Content-Disposition: form-data; name="myfile"; filename="demo.json" // Content-Type: application/json // // {"hello":"world"} // ------WebKitFormBoundaryQi7NBNu0nAmyAhpU--
If needed, we can also extract additional values like the Content-Type header and the boundary:
// FormData -> multipart/form-data async function convertFormDataToMultipart(formData) { const response = new Response(formData); const contentType = response.headers.get('Content-Type'); const boundary = contentType.match(/boundary=(\S+)/)[1]; return { contentType, boundary, body: await response.text(), }; } const multipart = await convertFormDataToMultipart(formData); console.log(multipart); // { // contentType: 'multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundarybfJIH5LgEGPqNcqt', // boundary: '----WebKitFormBoundarybfJIH5LgEGPqNcqt', // body: '------WebKitFormBoundarybfJIH5LgEGPqNcqt\r\n...' // }
Instead of using text(), we can also use other methods like arrayBuffer() to obtain the encoded content of FormData as an ArrayBuffer. The advantage of this type of value is that it's a transferable object and can be efficiently transferred between workers using postMessage() (meaning without copying, unlike a string). The FormData object itself is not transferable.
Converting Multipart/Form-Data String Back to FormData
To reverse the process, we again utilize Response, but this time we use its formData() method. A key aspect of this method is that it requires the correct Content-Type header, which must include the multipart/form-data type and the boundary used to separate the parts. If we have the boundary value, we can insert it into the header. However, we might only have the multipart string and nothing else. In that case, we can extract the boundary from the string using a regular expression.
// multipart/form-data string -> FormData async function convertMultipartStringToFormData(multipartString) { const boundary = multipartString.match(/^\s*--(\S+)/)[1]; return new Response(multipartString, { headers: { // Without the correct header, the string won't be parsed, // and an exception will be thrown on formData() call 'Content-Type': 'multipart/form-data; boundary=' + boundary, }, }).formData(); } const restoredFormData = await convertMultipartStringToFormData(multipartString); console.log([...restoredFormData]); // [ // ['value', '123'], // ['myfile', File] // ]
Just like with serializing FormData, we can convert not only strings but also ArrayBuffer, TypedArray, and ReadableStream into FormData, since Response accepts such values as the body value.
Conclusion
One potential downside is that both types of conversions are asynchronous operations. Other than that, the method seems quite reliable and can be used for debugging or when conversion is needed outside of fetch().
This method has wide browser support (it should work in any browser released after 2017). The method is also applicable in Node.js, Deno, and Bun if they support the Response object (i.e., versions where fetch() is available).
I hope you find this approach as intriguing as I did. It's a simple yet effective way to convert FormData to a multipart/form-data string (and not only a string) and back, leveraging the capabilities of the Response API. If you have any thoughts or know of other methods to achieve the same result, feel free to share in the comments!
The above is the detailed content of Converting FormData to a multipart/form-data String and Back Using Response. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.
