


How Can We Define Common Behavior for Collections of Different Slice Types in Go?
Defining Common Behavior for a Collection of Slices
This inquiry seeks recommendations for establishing consistent behavior among collections of slices. Consider the example of working with half open intervals. Suppose you have two types of such intervals:
- ClockInterval: Represents an interval within a single day, such as "from 1:00 pm afterwards."
- Period: Represents an interval with no defined end, such as "from 9 of July of 1810 we declare independence."
Both ClockInterval and Period slices are frequently encountered in code. The challenge arises when you need to find the enclosing interval for a given time. This necessitates writing the FindEnclosingHalfOpenInterval function for both types, leading to duplicative code.
The provided code sample (https://play.golang.org/p/Cy7fFaFzYJR) demonstrates one approach, involving type conversion between slices. However, it raises questions about whether there is a more efficient way to define common behavior for multiple slice types.
Converting Slices
The appropriate method to convert a slice from one type to another is to create a new slice and iterate over the elements, converting them individually. For faster conversion, you can pre-create the resulting slice:
func ToIntervalsFromClockIntervals(clockIntervals []ClockInterval) HalfOpenIntervals { intervals := make(HalfOpenIntervals, 0, len(clockIntervals)) for _, clockInterval := range clockIntervals { intervals = append(intervals, clockInterval) } return intervals }
Composition
Alternatively, consider using composition to solve this problem. This involves creating a base struct that contains the common FindEnclosingInterval logic. For example:
type HalfOpenIntervalBase struct { intervals []HalfOpenInterval } func (base *HalfOpenIntervalBase) FindEnclosingInterval(time Time) HalfOpenInterval { // Find and return the enclosing interval using base.intervals }
You can then create separate types for ClockInterval and Period that embed this base struct:
type ClockInterval struct { HalfOpenIntervalBase } type Period struct { HalfOpenIntervalBase }
Using this approach, both ClockInterval and Period can leverage the FindEnclosingInterval functionality from the base struct, eliminating duplication.
Over-Generalization
It's important to note that over-generalization can be counterproductive. While it's tempting to pursue a universal solution that avoids code duplication, it's not always the most practical approach in Go. Duplicating code for different types is often necessary and may ultimately lead to cleaner and more maintainable code.
The above is the detailed content of How Can We Define Common Behavior for Collections of Different Slice Types in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between Golang and Python are concurrency models, type systems, performance and execution speed. 1. Golang uses the CSP model, which is suitable for high concurrent tasks; Python relies on multi-threading and GIL, which is suitable for I/O-intensive tasks. 2. Golang is a static type, and Python is a dynamic type. 3. Golang compiled language execution speed is fast, and Python interpreted language development is fast.

Golang is usually slower than C, but Golang has more advantages in concurrent programming and development efficiency: 1) Golang's garbage collection and concurrency model makes it perform well in high concurrency scenarios; 2) C obtains higher performance through manual memory management and hardware optimization, but has higher development complexity.

Golang is widely used in cloud computing and DevOps, and its advantages lie in simplicity, efficiency and concurrent programming capabilities. 1) In cloud computing, Golang efficiently handles concurrent requests through goroutine and channel mechanisms. 2) In DevOps, Golang's fast compilation and cross-platform features make it the first choice for automation tools.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance efficiency. 1) Golang improves efficiency through goroutine and garbage collection, but may introduce pause time. 2) C realizes high performance through manual memory management and optimization, but developers need to deal with memory leaks and other issues. When choosing, you need to consider project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.