search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangHow Can We Define Common Behavior for Collections of Different Slice Types in Go?

How Can We Define Common Behavior for Collections of Different Slice Types in Go?

Defining Common Behavior for a Collection of Slices

This inquiry seeks recommendations for establishing consistent behavior among collections of slices. Consider the example of working with half open intervals. Suppose you have two types of such intervals:

  • ClockInterval: Represents an interval within a single day, such as "from 1:00 pm afterwards."
  • Period: Represents an interval with no defined end, such as "from 9 of July of 1810 we declare independence."

Both ClockInterval and Period slices are frequently encountered in code. The challenge arises when you need to find the enclosing interval for a given time. This necessitates writing the FindEnclosingHalfOpenInterval function for both types, leading to duplicative code.

The provided code sample (https://play.golang.org/p/Cy7fFaFzYJR) demonstrates one approach, involving type conversion between slices. However, it raises questions about whether there is a more efficient way to define common behavior for multiple slice types.

Converting Slices

The appropriate method to convert a slice from one type to another is to create a new slice and iterate over the elements, converting them individually. For faster conversion, you can pre-create the resulting slice:

func ToIntervalsFromClockIntervals(clockIntervals []ClockInterval) HalfOpenIntervals {
    intervals := make(HalfOpenIntervals, 0, len(clockIntervals))
    for _, clockInterval := range clockIntervals {
        intervals = append(intervals, clockInterval)
    }
    return intervals
}

Composition

Alternatively, consider using composition to solve this problem. This involves creating a base struct that contains the common FindEnclosingInterval logic. For example:

type HalfOpenIntervalBase struct {
    intervals []HalfOpenInterval
}

func (base *HalfOpenIntervalBase) FindEnclosingInterval(time Time) HalfOpenInterval {
    // Find and return the enclosing interval using base.intervals
}

You can then create separate types for ClockInterval and Period that embed this base struct:

type ClockInterval struct {
    HalfOpenIntervalBase
}

type Period struct {
    HalfOpenIntervalBase
}

Using this approach, both ClockInterval and Period can leverage the FindEnclosingInterval functionality from the base struct, eliminating duplication.

Over-Generalization

It's important to note that over-generalization can be counterproductive. While it's tempting to pursue a universal solution that avoids code duplication, it's not always the most practical approach in Go. Duplicating code for different types is often necessary and may ultimately lead to cleaner and more maintainable code.

The above is the detailed content of How Can We Define Common Behavior for Collections of Different Slice Types in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Golang and Python: Understanding the DifferencesGolang and Python: Understanding the DifferencesApr 18, 2025 am 12:21 AM

The main differences between Golang and Python are concurrency models, type systems, performance and execution speed. 1. Golang uses the CSP model, which is suitable for high concurrent tasks; Python relies on multi-threading and GIL, which is suitable for I/O-intensive tasks. 2. Golang is a static type, and Python is a dynamic type. 3. Golang compiled language execution speed is fast, and Python interpreted language development is fast.

Golang vs. C  : Assessing the Speed DifferenceGolang vs. C : Assessing the Speed DifferenceApr 18, 2025 am 12:20 AM

Golang is usually slower than C, but Golang has more advantages in concurrent programming and development efficiency: 1) Golang's garbage collection and concurrency model makes it perform well in high concurrency scenarios; 2) C obtains higher performance through manual memory management and hardware optimization, but has higher development complexity.

Golang: A Key Language for Cloud Computing and DevOpsGolang: A Key Language for Cloud Computing and DevOpsApr 18, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is widely used in cloud computing and DevOps, and its advantages lie in simplicity, efficiency and concurrent programming capabilities. 1) In cloud computing, Golang efficiently handles concurrent requests through goroutine and channel mechanisms. 2) In DevOps, Golang's fast compilation and cross-platform features make it the first choice for automation tools.

Golang and C  : Understanding Execution EfficiencyGolang and C : Understanding Execution EfficiencyApr 18, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance efficiency. 1) Golang improves efficiency through goroutine and garbage collection, but may introduce pause time. 2) C realizes high performance through manual memory management and optimization, but developers need to deal with memory leaks and other issues. When choosing, you need to consider project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang vs. Python: Concurrency and MultithreadingGolang vs. Python: Concurrency and MultithreadingApr 17, 2025 am 12:20 AM

Golang is more suitable for high concurrency tasks, while Python has more advantages in flexibility. 1.Golang efficiently handles concurrency through goroutine and channel. 2. Python relies on threading and asyncio, which is affected by GIL, but provides multiple concurrency methods. The choice should be based on specific needs.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in PerformanceGolang and C : The Trade-offs in PerformanceApr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang vs. Python: Applications and Use CasesGolang vs. Python: Applications and Use CasesApr 17, 2025 am 12:17 AM

ChooseGolangforhighperformanceandconcurrency,idealforbackendservicesandnetworkprogramming;selectPythonforrapiddevelopment,datascience,andmachinelearningduetoitsversatilityandextensivelibraries.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and SimilaritiesGolang vs. Python: Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
R.E.P.O. Best Graphic Settings
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Will R.E.P.O. Have Crossplay?
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

MantisBT

MantisBT

Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.