Home >Database >Mysql Tutorial >MySQL vs. MongoDB for 1000 Reads: Which Database Performs Better?

MySQL vs. MongoDB for 1000 Reads: Which Database Performs Better?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-12-02 05:42:15569browse

MySQL vs. MongoDB for 1000 Reads: Which Database Performs Better?

MySQL and MongoDB Performance Debate: A 1000 Reads Comparison

Background:

MongoDB has gained significant attention as a document-based database, prompting a comparison to the well-established relational database MySQL. This article investigates the performance differences between these two systems when faced with 1000 read operations.

Methodology:

A table named "posts" was created in MySQL with 20 million records and indexed on the "id" field. The same data was also loaded into a MongoDB collection. A custom PHP script was used to perform random reads from both databases concurrently.

Results:

Surprisingly, the results indicated that MongoDB exhibited only a marginal speed advantage over MySQL. The query execution time for 1000 reads was roughly 1.1 times faster in MongoDB.

Possible Explanations:

This unexpected finding contradicts the perception of MongoDB's superior performance for read-intensive operations. Here are some potential explanations:

  • Normalized vs. Denormalized Data: MySQL used a normalized schema, while MongoDB stored related data in a single document. In this scenario, MongoDB's denormalized approach offered no substantial performance benefits.
  • IO Efficiency: MySQL had to perform multiple index lookups and data reads from 20 different tables. In contrast, MongoDB performed a single index lookup and retrieved a single document, resulting in significantly lower IO operations.
  • Memory Usage: The 20 tables in MySQL potentially consumed more memory for indexing and storing data, while MongoDB consolidated all the data into a single collection, reducing memory overhead.

Conclusion:

While MongoDB offers certain advantages in specific use cases (e.g., when dealing with unstructured or highly interconnected data), it does not necessarily eclipse MySQL for all read-intensive workloads. The choice between these databases should depend on the specific data structure and query patterns of the application.

The above is the detailed content of MySQL vs. MongoDB for 1000 Reads: Which Database Performs Better?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn